» Articles » PMID: 34184002

Constructing a Control-ready Model of EEG Signal During General Anesthesia in Humans

Overview
Journal IFAC Pap OnLine
Date 2021 Jun 29
PMID 34184002
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Significant effort toward the automation of general anesthesia has been made in the past decade. One open challenge is in the development of control-ready patient models for closed-loop anesthesia delivery. Standard depth-of-anesthesia tracking does not readily capture inter-individual differences in response to anesthetics, especially those due to age, and does not aim to predict a relationship between a control input (infused anesthetic dose) and system state (commonly, a function of electroencephalography (EEG) signal). In this work, we developed a control-ready patient model for closed-loop propofol-induced anesthesia using data recorded during a clinical study of EEG during general anesthesia in ten healthy volunteers. We used principal component analysis to identify the low-dimensional state-space in which EEG signal evolves during anesthesia delivery. We parameterized the response of the EEG signal to changes in propofol target-site concentration using logistic models. We note that inter-individual differences in anesthetic sensitivity may be captured by varying a constant cofactor of the predicted effect-site concentration. We linked the EEG dose-response with the control input using a pharmacokinetic model. Finally, we present a simple nonlinear model predictive control demonstration of how such a closed-loop system would work.

Citing Articles

Machine learning of EEG spectra classifies unconsciousness during GABAergic anesthesia.

Abel J, Badgeley M, Meschede-Krasa B, Schamberg G, Garwood I, Lecamwasam K PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0246165.

PMID: 33956800 PMC: 8101756. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246165.

References
1.
Shanechi M, Chemali J, Liberman M, Solt K, Brown E . A brain-machine interface for control of medically-induced coma. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9(10):e1003284. PMC: 3814408. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003284. View

2.
Liu Y, Li M, Yang D, Zhang X, Wu A, Yao S . Closed-loop control better than open-loop control of profofol TCI guided by BIS: a randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the CONCERT-CL closed-loop system. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0123862. PMC: 4401751. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123862. View

3.
Levitt D, Schnider T . Human physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for propofol. BMC Anesthesiol. 2005; 5(1):4. PMC: 1090550. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-5-4. View

4.
Schnider T, Minto C, Shafer S, Gambus P, Andresen C, Goodale D . The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999; 90(6):1502-16. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00003. View

5.
Laguna Sanz A, Doyle 3rd F, Dassau E . An Enhanced Model Predictive Control for the Artificial Pancreas Using a Confidence Index Based on Residual Analysis of Past Predictions. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017; 11(3):537-544. PMC: 5505428. DOI: 10.1177/1932296816680632. View