» Articles » PMID: 34182817

Early Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Can Improve Outcomes in Patients with Non-traumatic Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department

Overview
Journal J Int Med Res
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jun 29
PMID 34182817
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes of patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest (CA) who received early versus late mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the Lund University Cardiac Assist System (LUCAS) device in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study in the ED of a single medical center performed from May 2018 to December 2019; 68 patients with CA were eligible. We grouped the patients according to the time to initiating LUCAS use after CA into an early group (≤4 minutes) and late group (>4 minutes).

Results: The rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was higher in the early group vs the late group (69.2% vs 52.4%, respectively). The 4-hour survival rate was significantly higher in the early group vs the late group (83.3% vs 45.5%, respectively), and CPR duration was significantly shorter in the early group (23.3 ± 12.5 vs 31.1 ± 14.8 minutes, respectively).

Conclusion: Early mechanical CPR can improve the success of achieving ROSC and the 4-hour survival rate in patients with non-traumatic CA in the ED, considering that more benefits were observed in patients who received early vs late LUCAS device therapy.

Citing Articles

Early prehospital mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation use for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study.

Liu Y, Chen L, Huang S, Hsu S, Hsu C, Sun J BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):198.

PMID: 39427139 PMC: 11491000. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01115-6.


Lund University Cardiac Arrest System and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Cardiac Arrest: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Patel A, Hwang C Cureus. 2022; 14(1):e21159.

PMID: 35165609 PMC: 8831361. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21159.

References
1.
Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Ostlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld R . Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. JAMA. 2013; 311(1):53-61. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.282538. View

2.
Dadeh A, Nuanjaroan B . Using initial serum lactate level in the emergency department to predict the sustained return of spontaneous circulation in nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Open Access Emerg Med. 2018; 10:105-111. PMC: 6163001. DOI: 10.2147/OAEM.S165154. View

3.
Savovic J, Jones H, Altman D, Harris R, Juni P, Pildal J . Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(6):429-38. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537. View

4.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 147(8):573-7. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010. View

5.
Stiell I, Brown S, Nichol G, Cheskes S, Vaillancourt C, Callaway C . What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients?. Circulation. 2014; 130(22):1962-70. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008671. View