» Articles » PMID: 34181661

Replication of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Treatment Outcome with Antidepressant Medications in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder from STAR*D and CAN-BIND-1

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Jun 28
PMID 34181661
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Antidepressants are first-line treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD), but 40-60% of patients will not respond, hence, predicting response would be a major clinical advance. Machine learning algorithms hold promise to predict treatment outcomes based on clinical symptoms and episode features. We sought to independently replicate recent machine learning methodology predicting antidepressant outcomes using the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) dataset, and then externally validate these methods to train models using data from the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND-1) dataset.

Methods: We replicated methodology from Nie et al (2018) using common algorithms based on linear regressions and decision trees to predict treatment-resistant depression (TRD, defined as failing to respond to 2 or more antidepressants) in the STAR*D dataset. We then trained and externally validated models using the clinical features found in both datasets to predict response (≥50% reduction on the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Rated [QIDS-SR]) and remission (endpoint QIDS-SR score ≤5) in the CAN-BIND-1 dataset. We evaluated additional models to investigate how different outcomes and features may affect prediction performance.

Results: Our replicated models predicted TRD in the STAR*D dataset with slightly better balanced accuracy than Nie et al (70%-73% versus 64%-71%, respectively). Prediction performance on our external methodology validation on the CAN-BIND-1 dataset varied depending on outcome; performance was worse for response (best balanced accuracy 65%) compared to remission (77%). Using the smaller set of features found in both datasets generally improved prediction performance when evaluated on the STAR*D dataset.

Conclusion: We successfully replicated prior work predicting antidepressant treatment outcomes using machine learning methods and clinical data. We found similar prediction performance using these methods on an external database, although prediction of remission was better than prediction of response. Future work is needed to improve prediction performance to be clinically useful.

Citing Articles

Prediction of individual patient outcomes to psychotherapy vs medication for major depression.

LoParo D, Dunlop B, Nemeroff C, Mayberg H, Craighead W Npj Ment Health Res. 2025; 4(1):4.

PMID: 39910171 PMC: 11799290. DOI: 10.1038/s44184-025-00119-9.


Correction: Replication of machine learning methods to predict treatment outcome with antidepressant medications in patients with major depressive disorder from STAR*D and CAN-BIND-1.

Nunez J, Nguyen T, Zhou Y, Cao B, Ng R, Chen J PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315844.

PMID: 39666655 PMC: 11637415. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315844.


Externally validated clinical prediction models for estimating treatment outcomes for patients with a mood, anxiety or psychotic disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Burghoorn D, Booij S, Schoevers R, Riese H BJPsych Open. 2024; 10(6):e221.

PMID: 39635739 PMC: 11698186. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.789.


Artificial intelligence, medications, pharmacogenomics, and ethics.

Haga S Pharmacogenomics. 2024; 25(14-15):611-622.

PMID: 39545629 PMC: 11703462. DOI: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2428587.


Transatlantic transferability and replicability of machine-learning algorithms to predict mental health crises.

Guerreiro J, Garriga R, Lozano Bagen T, Sharma B, Karnik N, Matic A NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):227.

PMID: 39251868 PMC: 11384787. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01203-8.


References
1.
Mundt J, Marks I, Shear M, Greist J . The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002; 180:461-4. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461. View

2.
Zimmerman M, Mattia J . The Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire: development, reliability and validity. Compr Psychiatry. 2001; 42(3):175-89. DOI: 10.1053/comp.2001.23126. View

3.
Rush A, Fava M, Wisniewski S, Lavori P, Trivedi M, Sackeim H . Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design. Control Clin Trials. 2004; 25(1):119-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00112-0. View

4.
Steger M, Kashdan T . Depression and Everyday Social Activity, Belonging, and Well-Being. J Couns Psychol. 2010; 56(2):289-300. PMC: 2860146. DOI: 10.1037/a0015416. View

5.
Nie Z, Vairavan S, Narayan V, Ye J, Li Q . Predictive modeling of treatment resistant depression using data from STAR*D and an independent clinical study. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0197268. PMC: 5991746. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197268. View