» Articles » PMID: 34178001

Physiological and Proteomic Analysis of Different Molecular Mechanisms of Sugar Beet Response to Acidic and Alkaline PH Environment

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2021 Jun 28
PMID 34178001
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Soil pH is a major constraint to crop plant growth and production. Limited data are available on sugar beet growth status under different pH conditions. In this study, we analyzed the growth status and phenotype of sugar beet under pH 5, pH 7.5, and pH 9.5. It was found that the growth of sugar beet was best at pH 9.5 and worst at pH 5. The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) in leaves and roots increased as pH decreased from 9.5 to 5. Moreover, compared with pH 9.5, the levels of soluble sugar and proline in leaves increased significantly at pH 5. To explore the mechanisms of sugar beet response to different soil pH environments, we hypothesized that proteins play an important role in plant response to acidic and alkaline pH environment. Thus, the proteome changes in sugar beet modulated by pH treatment were accessed by TMT-based quantitative proteomic analysis. A total of three groups of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) (pH 5 vs. pH 7.5, pH 9.5 vs. pH7.5 and pH 5 vs. pH 9.5) were identified in the leaves and roots of sugar beet. Several key proteins related to the difference of sugar beet response to acid (pH 5) and alkaline (pH 9.5) and involved in response to acid stress were detected and discussed. Moreover, based on proteomics results, QRT-PCR analysis confirmed that expression levels of three N transporters (, , and ) in roots were relatively high under alkaline conditions (pH 9.5) compared with pH 5 or pH 7.5. The total nitrogen content of pH 9.5 in sugar beet was significantly higher than that of pH 7.5 and pH 5. These studies increase our understanding of the molecular mechanism of sugar beet response to different pH environments.

Citing Articles

Soil and Mineral Nutrients in Plant Health: A Prospective Study of Iron and Phosphorus in the Growth and Development of Plants.

Bhat M, Mishra A, Shah S, Bhat M, Jan S, Rahman S Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(6):5194-5222.

PMID: 38920984 PMC: 11201952. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46060312.


The roles of DNA methylation on pH dependent i-motif (iM) formation in rice.

Feng Y, Ma X, Yang Y, Tao S, Ahmed A, Gong Z Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(3):1243-1257.

PMID: 38180820 PMC: 10853798. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad1245.


Protein Phosphorylation Orchestrates Acclimations of Arabidopsis Plants to Environmental pH.

Jain D, Schmidt W Mol Cell Proteomics. 2023; 23(1):100685.

PMID: 38000714 PMC: 10837763. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100685.


Alkalinity modulates a unique suite of genes to recalibrate growth and pH homeostasis.

Bailey M, Hsieh E, Tsai H, Ravindran A, Schmidt W Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1100701.

PMID: 37457359 PMC: 10348880. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1100701.


pH sensors in the plant apoplast: a of phenotypic plasticity.

Velez-Bermudez I, Schmidt W Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1227279.

PMID: 37426990 PMC: 10324574. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1227279.


References
1.
Siso-Terraza P, Luis-Villarroya A, Fourcroy P, Briat J, Abadia A, Gaymard F . Accumulation and Secretion of Coumarinolignans and other Coumarins in Roots in Response to Iron Deficiency at High pH. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:1711. PMC: 5120119. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01711. View

2.
Geng G, Li R, Stevanato P, Lv C, Lu Z, Yu L . Physiological and Transcriptome Analysis of Sugar Beet Reveals Different Mechanisms of Response to Neutral Salt and Alkaline Salt Stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:571864. PMC: 7604294. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.571864. View

3.
Choluj D, Wisniewska A, Szafranski K, Cebula J, Gozdowski D, Podlaski S . Assessment of the physiological responses to drought in different sugar beet genotypes in connection with their genetic distance. J Plant Physiol. 2014; 171(14):1221-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.04.016. View

4.
Qanmber G, Ali F, Lu L, Mo H, Ma S, Wang Z . Identification of Histone H3 () Genes in Revealed Diverse Expression During Ovule Development and Stress Responses. Genes (Basel). 2019; 10(5). PMC: 6562411. DOI: 10.3390/genes10050355. View

5.
Guo D, Chen F, Inoue K, Blount J, Dixon R . Downregulation of caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase and caffeoyl CoA 3-O-methyltransferase in transgenic alfalfa. impacts on lignin structure and implications for the biosynthesis of G and S lignin. Plant Cell. 2001; 13(1):73-88. PMC: 102215. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.13.1.73. View