» Articles » PMID: 34177940

Humanized Mouse Model As a Novel Approach in the Assessment of Human Allogeneic Responses in Organ Transplantation

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2021 Jun 28
PMID 34177940
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The outcome of organ transplantation is largely dictated by selection of a well-matched donor, which results in less chance of graft rejection. An allogeneic immune response is the main immunological barrier for successful organ transplantation. Donor and recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching diminishes outcomes after solid organ transplantation. The current evaluation of HLA incompatibility does not provide information on the immunogenicity of individual HLA mismatches and impact of non-HLA-related alloantigens, especially . Here we demonstrate a new method for analysis of alloimmune responsiveness between donor and recipient by introducing a humanized mouse model. Using molecular, cellular, and genomic analyses, we demonstrated that a recipient's personalized humanized mouse provided the most sensitive assessment of allogeneic responsiveness to potential donors. In our study, HLA typing provided a better recipient-donor match for one donor among two related donors. In contrast, assessment of an allogeneic response by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) was indistinguishable between these donors. We determined that, in the recipient's humanized mouse model, the donor selected by HLA typing induced the strongest allogeneic response with markedly increased allograft rejection markers, including activated cytotoxic Granzyme B-expressing CD8 T cells. Moreover, the same donor induced stronger upregulation of genes involved in the allograft rejection pathway as determined by transcriptome analysis of isolated human CD45cells. Thus, the humanized mouse model determined the lowest degree of recipient-donor alloimmune response, allowing for better selection of donor and minimized immunological risk of allograft rejection in organ transplantation. In addition, this approach could be used to evaluate the level of alloresponse in allogeneic cell-based therapies that include cell products derived from pluripotent embryonic stem cells or adult stem cells, both undifferentiated and differentiated, all of which will produce allogeneic immune responses.

Citing Articles

Immune suppression sustained allograft acceptance requires PD1 inhibition of CD8+ T cells.

Miller-Handley H, Harper G, Pham G, Turner L, Shao T, Russi A J Immunol. 2025; 214(1):192-198.

PMID: 40073258 PMC: 11904129. DOI: 10.1093/jimmun/vkae007.


Transferrin Disassociates TCR from CD3 Signaling Apparatus to Promote Metastasis.

Cheng R, Tang X, Zhao Q, Wang Y, Chen W, Wang G Research (Wash D C). 2025; 8():0578.

PMID: 39810853 PMC: 11731779. DOI: 10.34133/research.0578.


A review of animal models utilized in preclinical studies of approved gene therapy products: trends and insights.

Soufizadeh P, Mansouri V, Ahmadbeigi N Lab Anim Res. 2024; 40(1):17.

PMID: 38649954 PMC: 11034049. DOI: 10.1186/s42826-024-00195-6.


Animal model considerations for chordoma research: reproducing the tumor microenvironment with humanized mice.

Campilan B, Schroeder C, Sagaityte E, Arditi J, Leary O, Ziya L Gokaslan Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1330254.

PMID: 38544830 PMC: 10965562. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1330254.


T-Cell Mediated Immune Rejection of Beta-2-Microglobulin Knockout Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Kidney Organoids.

Gaykema L, van Nieuwland R, Lievers E, Moerkerk W, de Klerk J, Dumas S Stem Cells Transl Med. 2023; 13(1):69-82.

PMID: 37843402 PMC: 10785221. DOI: 10.1093/stcltm/szad069.


References
1.
Leblanc J, Subrt P, Pare M, Hartell D, Senecal L, Blydt-Hansen T . Practice Patterns in the Treatment and Monitoring of Acute T Cell-Mediated Kidney Graft Rejection in Canada. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018; 5:2054358117753616. PMC: 5818088. DOI: 10.1177/2054358117753616. View

2.
Hansen J, Yamamoto K, Petersdorf E, Sasazuki T . The role of HLA matching in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Rev Immunogenet. 2001; 1(3):359-73. View

3.
Chapman J . Progress in Transplantation: Will It Be Achieved in Big Steps or by Marginal Gains?. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016; 69(2):287-295. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.08.024. View

4.
Jones G . The number of reactive cells in mouse lymphocyte cultures stimulated by phytohemagglutinin, concanavalin A or histocompatibility antigen. J Immunol. 1973; 111(3):914-20. View

5.
Claas F, Dankers M, Oudshoorn M, van Rood J, Mulder A, Roelen D . Differential immunogenicity of HLA mismatches in clinical transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 2005; 14(3-4):187-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2005.03.007. View