» Articles » PMID: 34177051

SCREENING FOR DIABETIC RETINOPATHY - A TWELVE-MONTH REVIEW

Overview
Journal Acta Clin Croat
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jun 28
PMID 34177051
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose is to provide a twelve-month database review of screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR). A total of 1428 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients screened in 2017 were analyzed in a retrospective study. Retinal photographs were reviewed by an ophthalmologist for the presence and stage of DR, as well as for additional nondiabetic findings. The following grading categories of DR were used: without DR, mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR), moderate NPDR, severe non-proliferative NPDR, proliferative DR (PDR), clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and ungradable finding. Severe NPDR, PDR and CSME were classified as vision-threatening DR. Out of 1428 DM patients, 27 were diagnosed with type 1 DM and 1401 with type 2 DM, 353 of them had newly diagnosed type 2 DM. Without DR category was recorded in 85.2% of all eyes screened, 2.8% were ungradable, and 12% showed varying stages of DR. Vision-threatening DR was found in 2.8% and additional nondiabetic findings in 5.2% of all screened eyes. In the group of newly diagnosed type 2 DM, 92.5% of screened eyes were without DR, 3.1% were ungradable and 4.3% showed varying stages of DR. In the group of newly diagnosed type 2 DM, vision-threatening DR was recorded in 0.1% and additional nondiabetic finding in 5.7% of the eyes screened. In conclusion, a small proportion of screened DM patients with detected DR had vision-threatening DR.

Citing Articles

Present and future screening programs for diabetic retinopathy: a narrative review.

Taha A, Dinesen S, Vergmann A, Grauslund J Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024; 10(1):14.

PMID: 38310265 PMC: 10838429. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-024-00534-8.


Eight years' experience in mobile teleophthalmology for diabetic retinopathy screening.

Appukumran R, Shyamsundar K, Agrawal M, Khurana R, Pannu A, Kumar P Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2023; 11(4):162-170.

PMID: 37641607 PMC: 10460246. DOI: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1460.


SUBCLINICAL HYPOTHYROIDISM AS A CONTRIBUTOR TO MACROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS.

Marushchak M, Vivsiana I, Musiienko V, Krynytska I, Kozak K Acta Clin Croat. 2022; 60(3):483-495.

PMID: 35282484 PMC: 8907953. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.03.20.

References
1.
Tsui I, Havunjian M, Davis J, Giaconi J . Snapshot of Teleretinal Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy at the West Los Angeles Medical Center. Telemed J E Health. 2016; 22(10):843-846. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0246. View

2.
Burger W, Hovener G, Dusterhus R, Hartmann R, Weber B . Prevalence and development of retinopathy in children and adolescents with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. A longitudinal study. Diabetologia. 1986; 29(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF02427275. View

3.
Wang S, Tikellis G, Wong N, Wong T, Wang J . Lack of knowledge of glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008; 81(1):e15-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.03.011. View

4.
Forster A, Forbes A, Dodhia H, Connor C, du Chemin A, Sivaprasad S . Non-attendance at diabetic eye screening and risk of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: a population-based cohort study. Diabetologia. 2013; 56(10):2187-93. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-013-2975-0. View

5.
Javitt J, Aiello L, Chiang Y, Ferris 3rd F, Canner J, Greenfield S . Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government. Implications for health-care reform. Diabetes Care. 1994; 17(8):909-17. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.17.8.909. View