» Articles » PMID: 34176085

Suboptimal Therapy Following Breast Conserving Surgery in Triple-negative and HER2-positive Breast Cancer Patients

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Jun 27
PMID 34176085
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess potential disparities in guideline-concordant care delivery among women with early-stage triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy.

Methods: Women ≥ 40 years old diagnosed with pT2N0M0 triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer treated with primary surgery and axillary staging between 2012 and 2017 were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome was receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy and radiation concordant with current guidelines. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to assess the prevalence of optimal therapy use across patient and cancer characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess 5-year overall survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the impact of optimal therapy on 5-year mortality.

Results: 11,785 women were included with 7,843 receiving optimal therapy. Receipt of optimal therapy decreased with age even after adjusting for comorbidities and cancer characteristics; other sociodemographic factors were not associated with differences in receipt of optimal therapy. Among patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, most were not offered the treatment (49%) or refused (40%). Overall 5-year survival was higher among women who received optimal therapy (89% [95% CI 88.0-89.3] vs. 66% [95% CI 62.9-68.5]). Patients who received suboptimal therapy were over twice as likely to die within 5 years of their diagnosis (adjusted HR 2.44, 95% CI 2.12-2.82).

Conclusion: Age is the primary determinant of the likelihood of a woman to receive optimal adjuvant therapies in high-risk early-stage breast cancer. Patients who did not receive optimal therapy had significantly diminished survival.

Citing Articles

10-year survival in female breast cancer patients according to ER, PR and HER2 expression: a cancer registry population-based analysis.

Intrieri T, Manneschi G, Caldarella A J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022; 149(8):4489-4496.

PMID: 36129548 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04245-1.


Prognostic Factors and Models for Elderly (≥70 Years Old) Primary Operable Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis From the National Cancer Database.

Tang Z, Ji Y, Min Y, Zhang X, Xu W, Zhao L Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:856268.

PMID: 35370936 PMC: 8969604. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.856268.

References
1.
Perou C, Sorlie T, Eisen M, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey S, Rees C . Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000; 406(6797):747-52. DOI: 10.1038/35021093. View

2.
Hsu C, Wang X, Habif Jr D, Ma C, Johnson K . Breast cancer stage variation and survival in association with insurance status and sociodemographic factors in US women 18 to 64 years old. Cancer. 2017; 123(16):3125-3131. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30722. View

3.
Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh G, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A . Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004; 54(2):78-93. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.54.2.78. View

4.
Jemal A, Robbins A, Lin C, Flanders W, DeSantis C, Ward E . Factors That Contributed to Black-White Disparities in Survival Among Nonelderly Women With Breast Cancer Between 2004 and 2013. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 36(1):14-24. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7932. View

5.
Henley S, Ward E, Scott S, Ma J, Anderson R, Firth A . Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part I: National cancer statistics. Cancer. 2020; 126(10):2225-2249. PMC: 7299151. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32802. View