Units of Analysis in Task-analytic Research
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
We develop and discuss four criteria for evaluating the appropriateness of units of analysis for task-analytic research and suggest potential alternatives to the units of analysis currently used. Of the six solutions discussed, the most commonly used unit of analysis in current behavior analytic work, percentage correct, meets only one of the four criteria. Five alternative units of analysis are presented and evaluated: (a) percentage of opportunities to perform meeting criterion, (b) trials to criteria, (c) cumulative competent performances, (d) percentage correct with competent performance coded, and (e) percentage correct with competent performance coded and a grid showing performance on individual steps of the task analysis. Of the solutions evaluated, only one--percentage correct with competent performance coded and a task analysis grid--met all four criteria.
From Percentages to Precision: Using Response Rates to Advance Analyses of Procedural Fidelity.
St Peter C, Harvey O, Aguilar M Perspect Behav Sci. 2025; 48(1):23-39.
PMID: 40078356 PMC: 11893919. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-025-00433-9.
Using statistical process control to make data-based clinical decisions.
Pfadt A, Wheeler D J Appl Behav Anal. 1995; 28(3):349-70.
PMID: 7592154 PMC: 1279837. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-349.