Predictive Value of the Number of Frozen Blastocysts in Live Birth Rates of the Transferred Fresh Embryos

Overview

Journal J Ovarian Res

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Gynecology & Obstetrics
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2021 Jun 27

PMID 34174916

Citations 4

Authors

Jianyuan Song

Cuicui Duan

Wangyu Cai

Jian Xu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Blastocyst development by extended culture in vitro allows the embryos to 'select' themselves, thus successful growth to the blastocyst stage is a reflection of the developmental competence of cleavage stage embryos in a cohort. The study aims to determine whether the number of frozen blastocysts is associated with live birth rates of the transferred fresh embryos.

Method: The retrospective study included 8676 cycles of first fresh embryo transfer from January 2016 to June 2019 at a fertility center of a university hospital. The patients with ≥ 10 oocytes retrieved were divided into three groups according to the number of frozen blastocysts: 0 (group 1), 1-2 (group 2), and ≥ 3 (group 3). The primary outcome measure was the live birth. The secondary outcome measures included clinical pregnancy rates and implantation rates. Logistic regression analysis was also performed.

Results: Live birth rates in patients with ≥ 3 and 1-2 frozen blastocysts were 47.6% and 46.1%, respectively, which were significantly higher than that in patients without blastocyst (36.0%). The clinical pregnancy rate in group 3 was 65.1%, which was also significantly higher than the other two groups (47.0% and 59.2%). The implantation rates were 35.5%, 47.6%, and 56.0% in the three groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared with groups of frozen blastocysts, 0 frozen blastocyst yielded a lower rate of live birth (the adjusted odds ratio: 0.526, 95% CI: 0.469, 0.612).

Conclusion: In patients with optimal ovarian response that retrieved ≥ 10 oocytes, fresh embryos transfer followed by having blastocysts frozen is a strong indicator of pregnancy achievement, but the number of frozen blastocysts (if not = 0) has limited value in predicting live birth rates.

Citing Articles

Application of a methodological framework for the development and multicenter validation of reliable artificial intelligence in embryo evaluation.

Gilboa D, Garg A, Shapiro M, Meseguer M, Amar Y, Lustgarten N Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):16.

PMID: 39891250 PMC: 11783712. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01351-w.

Development speed of sibling embryo positively reflects live birth rate after fresh day 3 embryo transfer.

Wang X, Xiao Y, Zhou Y, Wang H Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6402.

PMID: 37076577 PMC: 10115796. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33573-6.

Assuring quality in assisted reproduction laboratories: assessing the performance of ART Compass - a digital art staff management platform.

Curchoe C, Bormann C, Hammond E, Salter S, Timlin C, Williams L J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(2):265-278.

PMID: 36637586 PMC: 9935773. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02713-2.

Retrospective analysis of GnRH-a prolonged protocol for in vitro fertilization in 18,272 cycles in China.

Tian L, Xia L, Wu Q J Ovarian Res. 2022; 15(1):110.

PMID: 36209186 PMC: 9548105. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-022-01044-7.

On the reproductive capabilities of aneuploid human preimplantation embryos.

Capalbo A, Poli M, Jalas C, Forman E, Treff N Am J Hum Genet. 2022; 109(9):1572-1581.

PMID: 36055209 PMC: 9502046. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.07.009.

References

Lundin K, Ahlstrom A . Quality control and standardization of embryo morphology scoring and viability markers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015; 31(4):459-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.026. View

Kasius A, Smit J, Torrance H, Eijkemans M, Mol B, Opmeer B . Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20(4):530-41. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu011. View

Hardarson T, Hanson C, Sjogren A, Lundin K . Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(2):313-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.2.313. View

Hamamah S . [Oocyte and embryo quality: is their morphology a good criterion?]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2005; 34(7 Pt 2):5S38-5S41. View

Van Soom A, Mateusen B, Leroy J, de Kruif A . Assessment of mammalian embryo quality: what can we learn from embryo morphology?. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004; 7(6):664-70. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62089-5. View

Stern J, Lieberman E, Macaluso M, Racowsky C . Is cryopreservation of embryos a legitimate surrogate marker of embryo quality in studies of assisted reproductive technology conducted using national databases?. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(4):890-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.050. View

van Loendersloot L, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt P, Repping S, van der Veen F . Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 16(6):577-89. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmq015. View

Salha O, Dada T, Levett S, Allgar V, Sharma V . The influence of supernumerary embryos on the clinical outcome of IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000; 17(6):335-43. PMC: 3455402. DOI: 10.1023/a:1009457112230. View

Gat I, Li N, Yasovich N, Antes R, Kuznyetsov V, Zohni K . Sperm DNA fragmentation index does not correlate with blastocyst euploidy rate in egg donor cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017; 34(3):212-216. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1379500. View

10.

Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S, Dirnfeld M . Effect of paternal age on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation model: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(4):857-865.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.036. View

11.

Lonergan P, Rizos D, Gutierrez-Adan A, Fair T, Boland M . Effect of culture environment on embryo quality and gene expression - experience from animal studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004; 7(6):657-63. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62088-3. View

12.

Rocha J, Passalia F, Matos F, Maserati Jr M, Alves M, Almeida T . Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016; 20(3):150-8. PMC: 5264381. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20160033. View

13.

Metello J, Tomas C, Ferreira P . Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019; 23(4):402-407. PMC: 6798599. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190043. View

14.

Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera A, Kaser D, Ubaldi F . Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 23(2):139-155. PMC: 5850862. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038. View

15.

Minasi M, Fabozzi G, Casciani V, Lobascio A, Colasante A, Scarselli F . Improved blastocyst formation with reduced culture volume: comparison of three different culture conditions on 1128 sibling human zygotes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014; 32(2):215-20. PMC: 4354175. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0399-5. View

16.

Wang J, Douglas N, Dicken C, Nakhuda G, Guarnaccia M, Sauer M . Cryopreservation of supernumerary high quality embryos predicts favorable outcomes for patients undergoing repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2007; 89(2):368-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.031. View

17.

Hill M, Richter K, Heitmann R, Lewis T, DeCherney A, Graham J . Number of supernumerary vitrified blastocysts is positively correlated with implantation and live birth in single-blastocyst embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(6):1631-6. PMC: 3648793. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.130. View

18.

Melado L, Arnanz A, Bayram A, Elkhatib I, De Munck N, Navarro A . Anti-Müllerian hormone is an independent marker for oocyte survival after vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020; 41(1):119-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.03.014. View

19.

Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft W . The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril. 2010; 95(2):520-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003. View

20.

Dieleman S, Hendriksen P, Viuff D, Thomsen P, Hyttel P, Knijn H . Effects of in vivo prematuration and in vivo final maturation on developmental capacity and quality of pre-implantation embryos. Theriogenology. 2002; 57(1):5-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00655-0. View