» Articles » PMID: 34174834

Strengthening Methods for Tracking Adaptations and Modifications to Implementation Strategies

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Jun 27
PMID 34174834
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Developing effective implementation strategies requires adequate tracking and reporting on their application. Guidelines exist for defining and reporting on implementation strategy characteristics, but not for describing how strategies are adapted and modified in practice. We built on existing implementation science methods to provide novel methods for tracking strategy modifications.

Methods: These methods were developed within a stepped-wedge trial of an implementation strategy package designed to help community clinics adopt social determinants of health-related activities: in brief, an 'Implementation Support Team' supports clinics through a multi-step process. These methods involve five components: 1) describe planned strategy; 2) track its use; 3) monitor barriers; 4) describe modifications; and 5) identify / describe new strategies. We used the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy to categorize strategies, Proctor et al.'s reporting framework to describe them, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to code barriers / contextual factors necessitating modifications, and elements of the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced to describe strategy modifications.

Results: We present three examples of the use of these methods: 1) modifications made to a facilitation-focused strategy (clinics reported that certain meetings were too frequent, so their frequency was reduced in subsequent wedges); 2) a clinic-level strategy addition which involved connecting one study clinic seeking help with community health worker-related workflows to another that already had such a workflow in place; 3) a study-level strategy addition which involved providing assistance in overcoming previously encountered (rather than de novo) challenges.

Conclusions: These methods for tracking modifications made to implementation strategies build on existing methods, frameworks, and guidelines; however, as none of these were a perfect fit, we made additions to several frameworks as indicated, and used certain frameworks' components selectively. While these methods are time-intensive, and more work is needed to streamline them, they are among the first such methods presented to implementation science. As such, they may be used in research on assessing effective strategy modifications and for replication and scale-up of effective strategies. We present these methods to guide others seeking to document implementation strategies and modifications to their studies.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03607617 (first posted 31/07/2018).

Citing Articles

Impacts of pragmatic implementation science in a primary care laboratory.

Huguet N, Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Holderness H, Lee A, DeVoe J J Clin Transl Sci. 2025; 9(1):e20.

PMID: 39911933 PMC: 11795856. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.682.


A conceptual framework for assessing implementation strategy integrity.

Molfenter T, Ducharme L, Stein L, Belenko S, Mitchell S, Watson D Implement Res Pract. 2024; 5:26334895241297278.

PMID: 39650595 PMC: 11622300. DOI: 10.1177/26334895241297278.


Firm, yet flexible: a fidelity debate paper with two case examples.

Albers B, Verweij L, Blum K, Oesch S, Schultes M, Clack L Implement Sci. 2024; 19(1):79.

PMID: 39639379 PMC: 11619306. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01406-3.


Harmonizing data across the accelerating colorectal cancer screening and follow-up through implementation science (ACCSIS) program to enhance data quality and promote data sharing.

Subramanian S, Kobrin S, Hoover S, Tan S, Brenner A, Campbell J BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1356.

PMID: 39506739 PMC: 11539253. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11542-7.


Tracking modifications to implementation strategies: a case study from SNaP - a hybrid type III randomized controlled trial to scale up integrated systems navigation and psychosocial counseling for PWID with HIV in Vietnam.

Nguyen M, Bartels S, Akiba C, Sripaipan T, Nong H, Dang L BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):249.

PMID: 39462341 PMC: 11520046. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02367-3.


References
1.
Watson D, Young J, Ahonen E, Xu H, Henderson M, Shuman V . Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention: protocol for a mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2014; 9:138. PMC: 4201917. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0138-4. View

2.
Albrecht L, Archibald M, Arseneau D, Scott S . Development of a checklist to assess the quality of reporting of knowledge translation interventions using the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) recommendations. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:52. PMC: 3661354. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-52. View

3.
Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw J, Eccles M . Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:40. PMC: 2717906. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-40. View

4.
Powell B, Fernandez M, Williams N, Aarons G, Beidas R, Lewis C . Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda. Front Public Health. 2019; 7:3. PMC: 6350272. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003. View

5.
Gold R, Bunce A, Cottrell E, Marino M, Middendorf M, Cowburn S . Study protocol: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge trial of tailored support for implementing social determinants of health documentation/action in community health centers, with realist evaluation. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1):9. PMC: 6348649. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0855-9. View