» Articles » PMID: 34174508

EMG Breakpoints for Detecting Anaerobic Threshold and Respiratory Compensation Point in Recovered COVID-19 Patients

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Physiology
Date 2021 Jun 26
PMID 34174508
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: A huge number of COVID-19 patients should be referred to rehabilitation programmes. Individualizing the exercise intensity by metabolic response provide good physiological results. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of EMG as a non-invasive determinant of the anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point, for more precise exercise intensity prescription.

Methods: An observational cross-sectional study with 66 recovered COVID-19 patients was carried out. The patients underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test with simultaneous assessment of muscle electromyography in vastus lateralis. EMG breakpoints were analyzed during the ramp-up protocol. The first and second EMG breakpoints were used for anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point determination.

Results: EMG and gas exchange analysis presented strong correlation in anaerobic threshold (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001) and respiratory compensation point detection (r = 0.99, p < 0.0001) detection. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a bias = -4.7 W (SD = 6.2 W, limits of agreement = -16.9 to 7.6) for anaerobic threshold detection in EMG compared to gas exchange analysis. In respiratory compensation point detection, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a bias = -2.1 W (SD = 4.5 W, limits of agreement = -10.9 to 6.6) in EMG compared to gas exchange analysis. EMG demonstrated a small effect size compared to gas exchange analysis in oxygen uptake and power output at anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point detection.

Conclusions: EMG analysis detects anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point without clinical significant difference than gas exchange analysis (gold standard method) in recovered COVID-19 patients.

References
1.
Zamuner A, Catai A, Martins L, Sakabe D, Silva E . Identification and agreement of first turn point by mathematical analysis applied to heart rate, carbon dioxide output and electromyography. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013; 17(6):614-22. PMC: 4207143. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000129. View

2.
Hug F, Laplaud D, Lucia A, Grelot L . EMG threshold determination in eight lower limb muscles during cycling exercise: a pilot study. Int J Sports Med. 2006; 27(6):456-62. DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-865787. View

3.
Jurimae J, von Duvillard S, Maestu J, Cicchella A, Purge P, Ruosi S . Aerobic-anaerobic transition intensity measured via EMG signals in athletes with different physical activity patterns. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007; 101(3):341-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0509-5. View

4.
HENNEMAN E, Somjen G, Carpenter D . FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS. J Neurophysiol. 1965; 28:560-80. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.560. View

5.
Vandoni M, Codrons E, Marin L, Correale L, Bigliassi M, Buzzachera C . Psychophysiological Responses to Group Exercise Training Sessions: Does Exercise Intensity Matter?. PLoS One. 2016; 11(8):e0149997. PMC: 4973874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149997. View