» Articles » PMID: 34173206

Navigating the Regulatory Landscape to Develop Pediatric Oncology Drugs: Expert Opinion Recommendations

Overview
Journal Paediatr Drugs
Specialties Pediatrics
Pharmacology
Date 2021 Jun 26
PMID 34173206
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Regulatory changes have been enacted in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) to encourage the development of new treatments for pediatric cancer. Here, we review some of the factors that have hampered the development of pediatric cancer treatments and provide a comparison of the US and EU regulations implemented to address this clinical need. We then provide some recommendations for each stage of the oncology drug development pathway to help researchers maximize their chance of successful drug development while complying with regulations. A key recommendation is the engagement of key stakeholders such as regulatory authorities, pediatric oncologists, academic researchers, patient advocacy groups, and a Pediatric Expert Group early in the drug development process. During drug target selection, sponsors are encouraged to consult the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the FDA target list, in addition to relevant US and European consortia that have been established to characterize and prioritize oncology drug targets. Sponsors also need to carefully consider the resourcing requirements for preclinical testing, which include ensuring appropriate access to the most relevant databases, clinical samples, and preclinical models (cell lines and animal models). During clinical development, sponsors can account for the pharmacodynamic (PD)/pharmacokinetic (PK) considerations specific to a pediatric population by developing pediatric formulations, selecting suitable PD endpoints, and employing sparse PK sampling or modeling/simulation of drug exposures where appropriate. Additional clinical considerations include the specific design of the clinical trial, the potential inclusion of children in adult trials, and the value of cooperative group trials.

Citing Articles

Off-label prescribing of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy at a single pediatric cancer center.

Gikandi A, Chi S, Yeo K, ONeill A, Shulman D, Dubois S Cancer Med. 2024; 13(8):e7154.

PMID: 38629258 PMC: 11022150. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7154.


Pediatric oncology drug development and dosage optimization.

Cheung S, Hay J, Lin Y, de Greef R, Bullock J Front Oncol. 2024; 13:1235947.

PMID: 38348118 PMC: 10860405. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1235947.


Genomics-Driven Precision Medicine in Pediatric Solid Tumors.

Suthapot P, Chiangjong W, Chaiyawat P, Choochuen P, Pruksakorn D, Sangkhathat S Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(5).

PMID: 36900212 PMC: 10000495. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051418.


Analysis of Paediatric Clinical Trial Characteristics and Activity Over 23 Years-Impact of the European Paediatric Regulation on a Single French Clinical Research Center.

Arnadottir J, Luc F, Kaguelidou F, Jacqz-Aigrain E Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:842480.

PMID: 35560985 PMC: 9086591. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.842480.


Racial Disparities in Renal Outcomes Over Time Among Hospitalized Children With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Chang J, Sears C, Torres V, Son M Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74(8):1430-1439.

PMID: 35384383 PMC: 9339464. DOI: 10.1002/art.42127.

References
1.
Salunke S, Tuleu C . The STEP database through the end-users eyes--USABILITY STUDY. Int J Pharm. 2015; 492(1-2):316-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.06.016. View

2.
Gwara M, Smith S, Woods C, Sheeren E, Woods H . International Children's Advisory Network: A Multifaceted Approach to Patient Engagement in Pediatric Clinical Research. Clin Ther. 2017; 39(10):1933-1938. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.09.002. View

3.
Kelly L, Sinha Y, Barker C, Standing J, Offringa M . Useful pharmacodynamic endpoints in children: selection, measurement, and next steps. Pediatr Res. 2018; 83(6):1095-1103. PMC: 6023695. DOI: 10.1038/pr.2018.38. View

4.
Oeffinger K, Mertens A, Sklar C, Kawashima T, Hudson M, Meadows A . Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(15):1572-82. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa060185. View

5.
Bailey G, Marien D . The value of juvenile animal studies "What have we learned from preclinical juvenile toxicity studies? II". Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2012; 92(4):273-91. DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.20328. View