» Articles » PMID: 34173051

Diagnosis of Interproximal Caries Lesions with Deep Convolutional Neural Network in Digital Bitewing Radiographs

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Jun 26
PMID 34173051
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of deep convolutional neural network (CNN) in the diagnosis of interproximal caries lesions in digital bitewing radiographs.

Methods And Materials: A total of 1,000 digital bitewing radiographs were randomly selected from the database. Of these, 800 were augmented and annotated as "decay" by two experienced dentists using a labeling tool developed in Python programming language. The 800 radiographs were consisted of 11,521 approximal surfaces of which 1,847 were decayed (lesion prevalence for train data was 16.03%). A CNN model known as you only look once (YOLO) was modified and trained to detect caries lesions in bitewing radiographs. After using the other 200 radiographs to test the effectiveness of the proposed CNN model, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated.

Results: The lesion prevalence for test data was 13.89%. The overall accuracy of the CNN model was 94.59% (94.19% for premolars, 94.97% for molars), sensitivity was 72.26% (75.51% for premolars, 68.71% for molars), specificity was 98.19% (97.43% for premolars, 98.91% for molars), PPV was 86.58% (83.61% for premolars, 90.44% for molars), and NPV was 95.64% (95.82% for premolars, 95.47% for molars). The overall AUC was measured as 87.19%.

Conclusions: The proposed CNN model showed good performance with high accuracy scores demonstrating that it could be used in the diagnosis of caries lesions in bitewing radiographs.

Clinical Significance: Correct diagnosis of dental caries is essential for a correct treatment procedure. CNNs can assist dentists in diagnosing approximal caries lesions in bitewing radiographs.

Citing Articles

Detection of dental caries under fixed dental prostheses by analyzing digital panoramic radiographs with artificial intelligence algorithms based on deep learning methods.

Ayhan B, Ayan E, Atsu S BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):216.

PMID: 39930440 PMC: 11809006. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05577-3.


Advanced AI-driven detection of interproximal caries in bitewing radiographs using YOLOv8.

Bayati M, Alizadeh Savareh B, Savareh B, Ahmadinejad H, Mosavat F Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4641.

PMID: 39920198 PMC: 11806056. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84737-x.


Near-infrared light reflection for the early detection of proximal caries in posterior teeth: an in vivo study.

Shen L, Yang X, Dong C, Tang X, Zheng S, Wang T BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):139.

PMID: 39865218 PMC: 11765916. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05481-w.


Observational Diagnostics: The Building Block of AI-Powered Visual Aid for Dental Practitioners.

Raj R, Rajappa R, Murthy V, Osanlouy M, Lawrence D, Ganhewa M Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851284 PMC: 11759822. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010009.


Comparative analysis of deep learning algorithms for dental caries detection and prediction from radiographic images: a comprehensive umbrella review.

Dashti M, Londono J, Ghasemi S, Zare N, Samman M, Ashi H PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024; 10:e2371.

PMID: 39650341 PMC: 11622875. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2371.


References
1.
Pitts N, Stamm J . International Consensus Workshop on Caries Clinical Trials (ICW-CCT)--final consensus statements: agreeing where the evidence leads. J Dent Res. 2004; 83 Spec No C:C125-8. DOI: 10.1177/154405910408301s27. View

2.
Kamburoglu K, Kolsuz E, Murat S, Yuksel S, Ozen T . Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41(6):450-9. PMC: 3520392. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/30526171. View

3.
Schwendicke F, Tzschoppe M, Paris S . Radiographic caries detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43(8):924-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.009. View

4.
Baelum V . What is an appropriate caries diagnosis?. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010; 68(2):65-79. DOI: 10.3109/00016350903530786. View

5.
Berkhout W, Beuger D, Sanderink G, van der Stelt P . The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/40677472. View