» Articles » PMID: 34172813

The Paradox of Second-order Homophily in Networks

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jun 26
PMID 34172813
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Homophily-the tendency of nodes to connect to others of the same type-is a central issue in the study of networks. Here we take a local view of homophily, defining notions of first-order homophily of a node (its individual tendency to link to similar others) and second-order homophily of a node (the aggregate first-order homophily of its neighbors). Through this view, we find a surprising result for homophily values that applies with only minimal assumptions on the graph topology. It can be phrased most simply as "in a graph of red and blue nodes, red friends of red nodes are on average more homophilous than red friends of blue nodes". This gap in averages defies simple intuitive explanations, applies to globally heterophilous and homophilous networks and is reminiscent of but structually distinct from the Friendship Paradox. The existence of this gap suggests intrinsic biases in homophily measurements between groups, and hence is relevant to empirical studies of homophily in networks.

Citing Articles

The enmity paradox.

Ghasemian A, Christakis N Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20040.

PMID: 37973933 PMC: 10654772. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47167-9.


Inequality and inequity in network-based ranking and recommendation algorithms.

Espin-Noboa L, Wagner C, Strohmaier M, Karimi F Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):2012.

PMID: 35132072 PMC: 8821643. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05434-1.

References
1.
Cheadle J, Schwadel P . The 'friendship dynamics of religion,' or the 'religious dynamics of friendship'? A social network analysis of adolescents who attend small schools. Soc Sci Res. 2012; 41(5):1198-212. PMC: 3461188. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.014. View

2.
Lee E, Karimi F, Wagner C, Jo H, Strohmaier M, Galesic M . Homophily and minority-group size explain perception biases in social networks. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 3(10):1078-1087. PMC: 6839769. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0677-4. View

3.
Newman M . Assortative mixing in networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2002; 89(20):208701. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.208701. View

4.
Altenburger K, Ugander J . Monophily in social networks introduces similarity among friends-of-friends. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 2(4):284-290. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0321-8. View

5.
Lerman K, Yan X, Wu X . The "Majority Illusion" in Social Networks. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0147617. PMC: 4757419. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147617. View