» Articles » PMID: 34172030

Facilitating Advance Care Planning in the General Practice Setting for Patients with a Chronic, Life-limiting Illness: Protocol for a Phase-III Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial and Process Evaluation of the ACP-GP Intervention

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2021 Jun 26
PMID 34172030
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP), a process of communication about patients' preferences for future medical care, should be initiated in a timely manner. Ideally situated for this initiation is the general practitioner (GP). The intervention to improve the initiation of ACP for patients with a chronic life-limiting illness in general practice (ACP-GP) includes an ACP workbook for patients, ACP communication training for GPs, planned ACP conversations, and documentation of ACP conversation outcomes in a structured template. We present the study protocol of a Phase-III randomized controlled trial (RCT) of ACP-GP that aims to evaluate its effects on outcomes at the GP, patient, and surrogate decision maker (SDM) levels; and to assess the implementation process of the intervention.

Methods: This RCT will take place in Flanders, Belgium. Thirty-six GPs, 108 patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness, and their (potential) SDM will be recruited, then cluster-randomized to the ACP-GP intervention or the control condition. The primary outcome for GPs is ACP self-efficacy; primary outcome for patients is level of ACP engagement. Secondary outcomes for GPs are ACP practices, knowledge and attitudes; and documentation of ACP discussion outcomes. Secondary outcomes for patients are quality of life; anxiety; depression; appointment of an SDM; completion of new ACP documents; thinking about ACP; and communication with the GP. The secondary outcome for the SDM is level of engagement with ACP. A process evaluation will assess the recruitment and implementation of the intervention using the RE-AIM framework.

Discussion: While the general practice setting holds promise for timely initiation of ACP, there is a lack of randomized trial studies evaluating the effectiveness of ACP interventions implemented in this setting. After this Phase-III RCT, we will be able to present valuable evidence of the effects of this ACP-GP intervention, with the potential for offering a well-tested and evaluated program to be implemented in general practice. The results of the process evaluation will provide insight into what contributes to or detracts from implementation success, as well as how the intervention can be adapted to specific contexts or needs.

Trial Registration: Prospectively registered at with ISRCTN ( ISRCTN12995230 ); registered 19/06/2020.

Citing Articles

Experiences with implementing advance care planning (ACP-GP) in Belgian general practice in the context of a cluster RCT: a process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.

Stevens J, Scherrens A, Pype P, Deliens L, De Vleminck A, Pardon K BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):247.

PMID: 38971761 PMC: 11227713. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02510-5.


Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Stevens J, Miranda R, Pype P, Eecloo K, Deliens L, De Vleminck A Br J Gen Pract. 2024; 74(739):e78-e87.

PMID: 38253546 PMC: 10824347. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0022.


Advance care planning engagement in patients with chronic, life-limiting illness: baseline findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Stevens J, Miranda R, Deliens L, Pype P, De Vleminck A, Pardon K Br J Gen Pract. 2023; 73(730):e384-e391.

PMID: 37012079 PMC: 10098835. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0100.


Barriers and facilitators for healthcare professionals to the implementation of Multidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning conversations at the outpatient clinic (the MUTUAL intervention): a sequential exploratory mixed-methods study.

van Lummel E, Meijer Y, Tjan D, van Delden J BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):24.

PMID: 36922796 PMC: 10015131. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01139-y.


The development and feasibility study of Multidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning conversations at the outpatient clinic: the MUTUAL intervention.

van Lummel E, Savelkoul C, Stemerdink E, Tjan D, van Delden J BMC Palliat Care. 2022; 21(1):119.

PMID: 35794617 PMC: 9258045. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-01005-3.


References
1.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

2.
Tierney W, Dexter P, Gramelspacher G, Perkins A, Zhou X, Wolinsky F . The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16(1):32-40. PMC: 1495157. View

3.
Billings J, Bernacki R . Strategic targeting of advance care planning interventions: the Goldilocks phenomenon. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174(4):620-4. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14384. View

4.
Teno J, Gruneir A, Schwartz Z, Nanda A, Wetle T . Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 55(2):189-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01045.x. View

5.
Gilissen J, Pivodic L, Wendrich-Van Dael A, Gastmans C, Vander Stichele R, Engels Y . Implementing the theory-based advance care planning ACP+ programme for nursing homes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation. BMC Palliat Care. 2020; 19(1):5. PMC: 6950862. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-019-0505-7. View