» Articles » PMID: 34171066

Prenatal Findings and Pregnancy Outcome in Fetuses with Right and Double Aortic Arch. A 10-year Experience at a Tertiary Center

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of the prenatal diagnosis and the relation between the type of right aortic arch (RAA) with other intra- or extracardiac (EC) and chromosomal anomalies.

Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted between 2011-2020 in a Romanian tertiary center. All RAA cases, including double aortic arch (DAA), were extracted from the databases and studied thoroughly.

Results: We detected 18 RAA cases: five (27.78%) type I (mirror image, "V" type), 11 (61.12%) type II ("U" type), and two (11.10%) DAA cases. Heart anomalies were associated in 38.89% (overall), 60% (type I), 36.37% (type II), and 0% (DAA) cases. Tetralogy of Fallot represented the most prevalent cardiac malformation (in 22.23% of cases). EC anomalies were present in 44.44% of fetuses (20% of type I, 54.55% of type II, and 50% of DAA cases). Genetic abnormalities were found in 41.17% of pregnancies, with 22q11.2 deletion in 23.53%. 55.55% of the cases had a good neonatal evolution and 44.45% of the pregnancies were terminated. An overall good outcome of pregnancy was noted in 40% of type I RAA, 63.64% of type II RAA, and 50% of DAA cases. All RAA cases examined in the first trimester were correctly diagnosed.

Conclusions: RAA can be accurately diagnosed and classified by means of prenatal ultrasound since early pregnancy. A detailed anatomy scan and genetic testing, including 22q11 deletion, should be offered to all pregnancies when RAA is discovered. When isolated, RAA associates a good outcome, indifferently the anatomical type.

Citing Articles

Prenatal diagnosis in fetal right aortic arch using chromosomal microarray analysis and whole exome sequencing: a Chinese single-center retrospective study.

Zhang L, Huang R, Zhou H, Lin X, Guo F, Jing X Mol Cytogenet. 2024; 17(1):22.

PMID: 39334424 PMC: 11438370. DOI: 10.1186/s13039-024-00691-3.


Analysis of prognostic risk factors and development of a predictive model for fetuses with right aortic arch with mirror-image branching: a prognostic evaluation method based on ultrasound parameter features.

Wei C, Ma B, Li T, Wang G, Chen Y, Li P Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(9):6869-6881.

PMID: 39281135 PMC: 11400677. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1648.

References
1.
FELSON B, Palayew M . THE TWO TYPES OF RIGHT AORTIC ARCH. Radiology. 1963; 81:745-59. DOI: 10.1148/81.5.745. View

2.
International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology , Carvalho J, Allan L, Chaoui R, Copel J, DeVore G . ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41(3):348-59. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12403. View

3.
Achiron R, Rotstein Z, Heggesh J, Bronshtein M, ZIMAND S, Lipitz S . Anomalies of the fetal aortic arch: a novel sonographic approach to in-utero diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 20(6):553-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00850.x. View

4.
Prabhu S, Mehra S, Kasturi S, Tiwari R, Joshi A, John C . Anatomic classification of the right aortic arch. Cardiol Young. 2020; 30(11):1694-1701. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951120003601. View

5.
Iliescu D, Comanescu A, Antsaklis P, Tudorache S, Ghilusi M, Comanescu V . Neuroimaging parameters in early open spina bifida detection. Further benefit in first trimester screening?. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011; 52(3):809-17. View