» Articles » PMID: 34169229

Data-Driven Diabetes Education Guided by a Personalized Report for Patients on Insulin Pump Therapy

Overview
Journal ACI open
Publisher Thieme
Date 2021 Jun 25
PMID 34169229
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: It is difficult to assess self-management behaviors (SMBs) and incorporate them into a personalized self-care plan. We aimed to develop and apply SMB phenotyping algorithms from data collected by diabetes devices and a mobile health (mHealth) application to create patient-specific SMBs reports to guide individualized interventions. Follow-up interventions aimed to understand patient's reasoning behind discovered SMB choices.

Methods: This study deals with adults on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) who self-tracked SMBs with an mHealth application for 1 month. Patient-generated data were quantified and an SMB report was designed and populated for each participant. A diabetes educator used the report to conduct personalized, data-driven educational interventions. Thematic analysis of the intervention was conducted.

Results: Twenty-two participants recorded 118 alcohol, 251 exercise, 2,661 meal events, and 1,900 photos. A patient-specific SMB report was created from this data and used to conduct the educational intervention. High variability of SMB was observed between patients. There was variability in the percentage of alcohol events accompanied by a blood glucose check, median 79% (38-100% range), and frequency of changing the bolus waveform, median 11 (7-95 range). Interventions confirmed variability of SMBs. Main emerging themes from thematic analysis were: challenges and barriers, motivators, current SMB techniques, and future plans to improve glycemic control.

Conclusion: The ability to quantify SMBs and understand patients' rationale may help improve diabetes self-care and related outcomes. This study describes our first steps in piloting a patient-specific diabetes educational intervention, as opposed to the current "one size fits all" approach.

References
1.
Kent D, Quinn L . Factors That Affect Quality of Life in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2018; 44(6):501-509. DOI: 10.1177/0145721718808733. View

2.
Ziegler R, Rees C, Jacobs N, Parkin C, Lyden M, Petersen B . Frequent use of an automated bolus advisor improves glycemic control in pediatric patients treated with insulin pump therapy: results of the Bolus Advisor Benefit Evaluation (BABE) study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2015; 17(5):311-8. DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12290. View

3.
Karway G, Grando M, Grimm K, Groat D, Cook C, Thompson B . Self-Management Behaviors of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Comparing Two Sources of Patient-Generated Data. Appl Clin Inform. 2020; 11(1):70-78. PMC: 6976334. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1701002. View

4.
Ritholz M, Beverly E, Weinger K . Digging deeper: the role of qualitative research in behavioral diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2011; 11(6):494-502. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-011-0226-7. View

5.
Rhee M, Slocum W, Ziemer D, Culler S, Cook C, El-Kebbi I . Patient adherence improves glycemic control. Diabetes Educ. 2005; 31(2):240-50. DOI: 10.1177/0145721705274927. View