» Articles » PMID: 34164800

Patient Experiences, Satisfaction, and Expectations with Current Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment: Results of the SLE-UPDATE Survey

Overview
Journal Rheumatol Ther
Date 2021 Jun 24
PMID 34164800
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To provide information on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients' experiences, satisfaction, and expectations with treatments and examine the association between treatment satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO).

Methods: A cross-sectional, non-interventional, online survey of US adult patients with SLE was conducted in 2019. The survey consisted of 104 questions about SLE and the following PRO instruments: LupusPRO™, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), an 11-point Worst Pain Numerical Rating scale (NRS), and an 11-point Worst Joint Pain NRS.

Results: Five hundred participants (75% female, 76% White/Caucasian, mean age 42.6 ± 12.7 years, 63% with an associate degree or higher) completed the survey. Most participants were "completely" or "somewhat satisfied" with their treatments, although satisfaction rates were lower for corticosteroids (65%), immunosuppressants (71%), and anti-malarials (55%) than for belimumab (intravenous or subcutaneous) (86%) and rituximab (94%). Treatments were more often considered "burdensome" or "very burdensome" for belimumab (67%) and rituximab (63%) than for corticosteroids (48%), immunosuppressants (49%), and anti-malarials (30%). Pain and productivity assessments supported substantial impairment for the majority of participants, even those who indicated that they were completely satisfied with treatments. The treatment goals most commonly reported as "very important" were reducing fatigue, pain, and the frequency or severity of flares. Three-quarters of participants (76.6%) indicated that their physician's goals for their therapy matched their own goals "very" or "somewhat closely." Despite high levels of satisfaction, most participants (63.0%) indicated that their physicians had not asked about their treatment goals during the past 3 months.

Conclusion: SLE patients reported high rates of satisfaction with current therapies despite identifying substantial treatment burdens, residual pain, and fatigue. Reduced fatigue, pain, and flares were the most important treatment goals for these patients.

Citing Articles

Impact of quality of life on overall work productivity impairment and activity impairment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the PEONY study.

Tanaka Y, Miyazaki Y, Hirata S, Kusaka K, Kosaka S, Nakatsuka K Lupus Sci Med. 2025; 12(1.

PMID: 39832910 PMC: 11751967. DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001291.


Quality indicators and satisfaction with care in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Serna-Pena G, Castillo-de la Garza R, Garcia-Arellano G, Cardenas-de la Garza J, Aguilar-Rivera L, de Leon-Perez A Rheumatol Int. 2023; 44(5):831-837.

PMID: 37610651 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05429-9.


An online survey of the Spanish Lupus Patient Association (FELUPUS): patient perceptions and experiences.

Salman-Monte T, Mateo P, Izquierdo M, Cervera R, Lopez N, Pallares L Clin Rheumatol. 2023; 42(5):1259-1265.

PMID: 36627527 PMC: 9838362. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06500-3.


Clinical Value of Serum Neuron-Specific Enolase Combined with Serum S100B Protein in the Diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Chen J, Cheng Y, Zhang X, Wang F, Chuai X Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022; 2022:9390991.

PMID: 35615727 PMC: 9110203. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9390991.


Cross-sectional study of the effects of self-efficacy on fatigue and pain interference in black women with systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of depression, age and education.

Drenkard C, Easley K, Bao G, Dunlop-Thomas C, Lim S, Brady T Lupus Sci Med. 2022; 9(1).

PMID: 35149578 PMC: 8845307. DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000566.

References
1.
Kariburyo F, Xie L, Sah J, Li N, Lofland J . Real-world medication use and economic outcomes in incident systemic lupus erythematosus patients in the United States. J Med Econ. 2019; 23(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1678170. View

2.
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alunno A, Aringer M, Bajema I, Boletis J . 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 78(6):736-745. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215089. View

3.
Mozaffarian N, Lobosco S, Lu P, Roughley A, Alperovich G . Satisfaction with control of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: physician and patient perspectives. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016; 10:2051-2061. PMC: 5063293. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S111725. View

4.
Pascoe K, Lobosco S, Bell D, Hoskin B, Chang D, Pobiner B . Patient- and Physician-reported Satisfaction With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment in US Clinical Practice. Clin Ther. 2017; 39(9):1811-1826. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.07.039. View

5.
Gladman D, Ibanez D, Urowitz M . Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol. 2002; 29(2):288-91. View