» Articles » PMID: 34164047

Insight into the Drastically Different Triplet Lifetimes of BODIPY Obtained by Optical/magnetic Spectroscopy and Theoretical Computations

Overview
Journal Chem Sci
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2021 Jun 24
PMID 34164047
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The triplet state lifetimes of organic chromophores are crucial for fundamental photochemistry studies as well as applications as photosensitizers in photocatalysis, photovoltaics, photodynamic therapy and photon upconversion. It is noteworthy that the triplet state lifetime of a chromophore can vary significantly for its analogues, while the exact reason was rarely studied. Herein with a few exemplars of typical BODIPY derivatives, which show triplet lifetimes varying up to 110-fold (1.4-160 μs), we found that for these derivatives with short triplet state lifetimes ( 1-3 μs), the electron spin polarization (ESP) pattern of the time-resolved electron paramagnetic resonance (TREPR) spectra of the triplet state is inverted at a longer delay time after laser pulse excitation, as a consequence of a strong anisotropy in the decay rates of the zero-field state sublevel of the triplet state. For the derivatives showing longer triplet state lifetimes (>50 μs), no such ESP inversion was observed. The observed fast decay of one sublevel is responsible for the short triplet state lifetime; theoretical computations indicate that it is due to a strong coupling between the T sublevel and the ground state mediated by the spin-orbit interaction. Another finding is that the heavy atom effect on the shortening of the triplet state lifetime is more significant for the T states with lower energy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic study to rationalize the short triplet state lifetime of visible-light-harvesting organic chromophores. Our results are useful for fundamental photochemistry and the design of photosensitizers showing long-lived triplet states.

Citing Articles

Quantum Chemical and Trajectory Surface Hopping Molecular Dynamics Study of Iodine-Based BODIPY Photosensitizer.

Wasif Baig M, Pederzoli M, Kyvala M, Pittner J J Comput Chem. 2025; 46(7):e70026.

PMID: 40068139 PMC: 11896635. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.70026.


Lowering of the singlet-triplet energy gap via intramolecular exciton-exciton coupling.

Schafer C, Ringstrom R, Hanrieder J, Rahm M, Albinsson B, Borjesson K Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8705.

PMID: 39379375 PMC: 11461719. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53122-7.


Highly Efficient Photosensitizers with Molecular Vibrational Torsion for Cancer Photodynamic Therapy.

Zhou X, Shi C, Long S, Yao Q, Ma H, Chen K ACS Cent Sci. 2023; 9(8):1679-1691.

PMID: 37637741 PMC: 10451034. DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c00611.


Origin of intersystem crossing in highly distorted organic molecules: a case study with red light-absorbing ,,,-boron-chelated Bodipys.

Zhang X, Sukhanov A, Liu X, Taddei M, Zhao J, Harriman A Chem Sci. 2023; 14(19):5014-5027.

PMID: 37206394 PMC: 10189861. DOI: 10.1039/d3sc00854a.


Spin-Vibronic Control of Intersystem Crossing in Iodine-Substituted Heptamethine Cyanines.

Tovtik R, Muchova E, Stackova L, Slavicek P, Klan P J Org Chem. 2023; 88(11):6716-6728.

PMID: 37146036 PMC: 10242761. DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c00005.


References
1.
Schaferling M . The art of fluorescence imaging with chemical sensors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012; 51(15):3532-54. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201105459. View

2.
Collauto A, Barbon A, Brustolon M . First determination of the spin relaxation properties of a nitronyl nitroxide in solution by electron spin echoes at X-band: a comparison with Tempone. J Magn Reson. 2012; 223:180-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.07.011. View

3.
de Silva A, Gunaratne H, Gunnlaugsson T, Huxley A, McCoy C, Rademacher J . Signaling Recognition Events with Fluorescent Sensors and Switches. Chem Rev. 1997; 97(5):1515-1566. DOI: 10.1021/cr960386p. View

4.
Ziessel R, Harriman A . Artificial light-harvesting antennae: electronic energy transfer by way of molecular funnels. Chem Commun (Camb). 2010; 47(2):611-31. DOI: 10.1039/c0cc02687e. View

5.
Ravelli D, Fagnoni M, Albini A . Photoorganocatalysis. What for?. Chem Soc Rev. 2012; 42(1):97-113. DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35250h. View