» Articles » PMID: 34162637

Birth Defects Surveillance After Assisted Reproductive Technology in Beijing: a Whole of Population-based Cohort Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jun 24
PMID 34162637
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare the differences in the prevalence of birth defects among offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) and conceived spontaneously (non-ART), and assess the contribution of ART to birth defects.

Design: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Beijing.

Participants: Pregnant women whose expected date of childbirth was verified as occurring between October 2014 and September 2015, and were registered on the Beijing Maternal and Child Health Information Network System, were the recorded pregnancy outcomes. 2699 ART offspring and 191 368 non-ART offspring (live births, stillbirths and medical terminations) were included in our study.

Interventions: None.

Outcome Measures: Risk ratios (RR) for birth defects were calculated among ART conceptions and non-ART conceptions with confounding factors by using logistic regression models.

Results: 194 067 offspring were included in the present study, and 2699 (1.4%) were conceived using ART. Among all the births, the prevalence of any birth defect in the ART offspring (5.5%) was significantly higher than in the non-ART offspring (3.8%) (crude RR, 1.49, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.76). After adjusting for confounding factors, ART use was still associated with an increased risk of any birth defect (5.4% vs 3.5% in ART and non-ART group, adjusted RR (aRR), 1.43, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.90), especially for chromosomal abnormalities (0.5% vs 0.2% in ART and non-ART group, aRR, 3.11, 95% CI 1.28 to 7.58), in singleton births to mothers <35 years. Circulatory system malformations and musculoskeletal system malformations were observed to have a non-significant increase in offspring conceived by ART. However, the associations between ART and birth defects were not detected in multiple births or mothers ≥35 years.

Conclusions: This study confirmed a small but significant association between ART and birth defects. However, the risk tends to be non-significant under the conditions of advanced maternal age or multiple pregnancies.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and death rate of birth defects from population-based surveillance in Hunan Province, China, 2010-2020.

Zhou X, Xie D, Jiang Y, Fang J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14609.

PMID: 38918397 PMC: 11199636. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65072-7.


Is there a relationship between assisted reproductive technology and maternal outcomes? A systematic review of cohort studies.

Heshmatnia F, Jafari M, Bozorgian L, Yadollahi P, Khalajinia Z, Azizi M Int J Reprod Biomed. 2024; 21(11):861-880.

PMID: 38292514 PMC: 10823119. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i11.14651.


Cardiovascular health of offspring conceived by assisted reproduction technology: a comprehensive review.

Li J, Liu Y, Huang H, Jin L Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1287060.

PMID: 38292241 PMC: 10824981. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1287060.


Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Risk of Congenital Heart Diseases in Children: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Gullo G, Scaglione M, Lagana A, Perino A, Andrisani A, Chiantera V Reprod Sci. 2023; 30(10):2896-2906.

PMID: 37145300 PMC: 10556115. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01252-6.


Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Huang Z, Xiao F, Xiao H, Lu Y, Yang L, Zhuang D JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(4):e236537.

PMID: 37014641 PMC: 10074225. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6537.


References
1.
Adamson G, de Mouzon J, Chambers G, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O . International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(6):1067-1080. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.039. View

2.
Kallen B . Congenital malformations in twins: a population study. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1986; 35(3-4):167-78. DOI: 10.1017/s0001566000005687. View

3.
Boulet S, Kirby R, Reefhuis J, Zhang Y, Sunderam S, Cohen B . Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects Among Liveborn Infants in Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan, 2000-2010. JAMA Pediatr. 2016; 170(6):e154934. PMC: 4899282. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4934. View

4.
Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, de Klerk N, Kurinczuk J . Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects--a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2004; 20(2):328-38. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh593. View

5.
Hay S, Wehrung D . Congenital malformations in twins. Am J Hum Genet. 1970; 22(6):662-78. PMC: 1706654. View