» Articles » PMID: 34158097

Using the Biopsychosocial Model for Identifying Subgroups of Detained Juveniles at Different Risk of Re-offending in Practice: a Latent Class Regression Analysis Approach

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Jun 23
PMID 34158097
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Juvenile delinquents constitute a heterogeneous group, which complicates decision-making based on risk assessment. Various psychosocial factors have been used to define clinically relevant subgroups of juvenile offenders, while neurobiological variables have not yet been integrated in this context. Moreover, translation of neurobiological group differences to individual risk assessment has proven difficult. We aimed to identify clinically relevant subgroups associated with differential youth offending outcomes, based on psychosocial and neurobiological characteristics, and to test whether the resulting model can be used for risk assessment of individual cases.

Methods: A group of 223 detained juveniles from juvenile justice institutions was studied. Latent class regression analysis was used to detect subgroups associated with differential offending outcome (recidivism at 12 month follow-up). As a proof of principle, it was tested in a separate group of 76 participants whether individual cases could be assigned to the identified subgroups, using a prototype 'tool' for calculating class membership.

Results: Three subgroups were identified: a 'high risk-externalizing' subgroup, a 'medium risk-adverse environment' subgroup, and a 'low risk-psychopathic traits' subgroup. Within these subgroups, both autonomic nervous system and neuroendocrinological measures added differentially to the prediction of subtypes of reoffending (no, non-violent, violent). The 'tool' for calculating class membership correctly assigned 92.1% of participants to a class and reoffending risk.

Conclusions: The LCRA approach appears to be a useful approach to integrate neurobiological and psychosocial risk factors to identify subgroups with different re-offending risk within juvenile justice institutions. This approach may be useful in the development of a biopsychosocial assessment tool and may eventually help clinicians to assign individuals to those subgroups and subsequently tailor intervention based on their re-offending risk.

Citing Articles

Evaluating sensitivity to classification uncertainty in latent subgroup effect analyses.

Loh W, Kim J BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022; 22(1):247.

PMID: 36153493 PMC: 9508766. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01720-8.


Integrating Cognitive Developmental Neuroscience in Society: Lessons Learned From a Multidisciplinary Research Project on Education and Social Safety of Youth.

Vandenbroucke A, Crone E, van Erp J, Guroglu B, Hulshoff Pol H, de Kogel C Front Integr Neurosci. 2021; 15:756640.

PMID: 34880735 PMC: 8645937. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2021.756640.

References
1.
Ortiz J, Raine A . Heart rate level and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004; 43(2):154-62. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200402000-00010. View

2.
Bernstein D, Ahluvalia T, Pogge D, Handelsman L . Validity of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in an adolescent psychiatric population. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997; 36(3):340-8. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199703000-00012. View

3.
Scarpa A, Haden S, Tanaka A . Being hot-tempered: autonomic, emotional, and behavioral distinctions between childhood reactive and proactive aggression. Biol Psychol. 2009; 84(3):488-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.11.006. View

4.
Hinnant J, Erath S, El-Sheikh M . Harsh parenting, parasympathetic activity, and development of delinquency and substance use. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015; 124(1):137-51. PMC: 4333737. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000026. View

5.
Mulder E, Vermunt J, Brand E, Bullens R, Van Marle H . Recidivism in subgroups of serious juvenile offenders: different profiles, different risks?. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2012; 22(2):122-35. DOI: 10.1002/cbm.1819. View