Efficacy of Daratumumab-Based Regimens Compared to Standard of Care in Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis

Daratumumab (dara) belongs to a class of monoclonal antibodies that target CD38 receptors expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. It was first approved for MM treatment in 2015. The efficacy and safety of dara have been reported in many studies. In this analysis, we assessed the outcome of dara addition to standard of care for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed (ND) MM. We conducted a comprehensive search using PubMed, ClinicalTrial.gov, and Embase. Out of 435 articles, we included two randomized clinical trials. We computed the odds ratio (OR) of response rates and risk ratio (RR) of adverse effects using Cochrane RevMan version 5.4. A total of 1,292 patients were enrolled in both trials. The patients were randomized into the control group and the dara group. The dara group included 647 patients and the control group included 645 patients. The CASSIOPEIA trial reported the outcomes using dara, bortezomib (V), thalidomide (T), and dexamethasone (d) versus VTd. The GRIFFIN trial underlined the efficacy of dara, lenalidomide (R), and Vd in the dara group versus RVd in the control group. A pooled analysis of included studies showed an increased overall response rate (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.06-2.41; = 0.02; = 65%), stringent complete response (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.24-2.05; = 0.03; = 0%), and negative status for minimal residual disease (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.97-3.10; < 0.01; = 66%) in the dara group as compared to the control group. However, an increased risk of neutropenia (RR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.60-2.03; < 0.01) and decreased risk of peripheral neuropathy (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86-0.99; = 0.02; = 52%) were observed in the dara group. Dara addition to the standard of care regimen for transplant-eligible NDMM has promising outcomes with increased efficacy and safety profile and manageable toxicity.