» Articles » PMID: 34154690

What Should Be Measured to Assess the Quality of Community-based Palliative Care? Results from a Collaborative Expert Workshop

Overview
Date 2021 Jun 22
PMID 34154690
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The need for palliative care (PC) will continue to increase in Canada with population aging. Many older adults prefer to "age in place" and receive care in their own homes. Currently, there is a lack of standardized quality indicators (QIs) for PC delivered in the community in Canada.

Methods: A one-day workshop collected expert opinions on what should be measured to capture quality PC. Three brainstorming sessions were focused on addressing the following questions: (1) what is important to measure to support quality PC, regardless of setting? (2) Of the identified measures, are any of special importance to care provided in the home? (3) What are the challenges, barriers, and opportunities for creating these measures? The National Consensus Project (NCP) for Quality Palliative Care framework was used as a guide to group together important comments into key themes.

Results: The experts identified four themes that are important for measuring quality, regardless of care setting, including access to care in the community by a multidisciplinary team, care for the individual with PC needs, support for the informal caregiver (e.g., family, friends), and symptom management for individuals with PC needs. Two additional themes were of special importance to measuring quality PC in the home, including spiritual care for individuals with PC needs and home as the preferred place of death. The challenges, barriers, and potential opportunities to these quality issues were also discussed.

Significance Of Results: PC experts, through this collaborative process, made a substantial contribution to the creation of a standardized set of QIs for community-based PC. Having a standardized set of QIs will enable health care professionals and decision makers to target areas for improvement, implement interventions to improve the quality of care, and ultimately, optimize the health and well-being of individuals with a serious illness.

Citing Articles

Comparing quality indicator rates for home care clients receiving palliative and end-of-life care before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Kruizinga J, Fisher K, Guthrie D, Northwood M, Kaasalainen S BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):11.

PMID: 38178110 PMC: 10768311. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01336-9.


POMSNAME: an aide-mémoire to improve the assessment and documentation of palliative care - a longitudinal project.

Dadich A, Gliniecka M, Cull M, Womsley K BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):157.

PMID: 37865745 PMC: 10590006. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01279-1.


A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data.

Guthrie D, Williams N, Beach C, Buzath E, Cohen J, Declercq A PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0266569.

PMID: 35390091 PMC: 8989210. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266569.


"The system is well intentioned, but complicated and fallible" interviews with caregivers and decision makers about palliative care in Canada.

Luymes N, Williams N, Garrison L, Goodridge D, Silveira M, Guthrie D BMC Palliat Care. 2021; 20(1):149.

PMID: 34551748 PMC: 8459520. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00843-x.