» Articles » PMID: 34154636

The Impact of Improved Water Supply on Cholera and Diarrhoeal Diseases in Uvira, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a Protocol for a Pragmatic Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomised Trial and Economic Evaluation

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Jun 22
PMID 34154636
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Diarrhoeal disease remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Cholera alone is estimated to cause 95,000 deaths per year, most of which occur in endemic settings with inadequate water access. Whilst a global strategy to eliminate cholera by 2030 calls for investment in improved drinking water services, there is limited rigorous evidence for the impact of improved water supply on endemic cholera transmission in low-income urban settings. Our protocol is designed to deliver a pragmatic health impact evaluation of a large-scale water supply intervention in Uvira (Democratic Republic of the Congo), a cholera transmission hotspot.

Methods/design: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) was designed to evaluate the impact of a large-scale drinking water supply intervention on cholera incidence among the 280,000 inhabitants of Uvira. The city was divided into 16 clusters, where new community and household taps will be installed following a randomised sequence over a transition period of up to 8 weeks in each cluster. The primary trial outcomes are the monthly incidence of "confirmed" cholera cases (patients testing positive by rapid detection kit) and of "suspected" cholera cases (patients admitted to the cholera treatment centre). Concurrent process and economic evaluations will provide further information on the context, costs, and efficiency of the intervention.

Discussion: In this protocol, we describe a pragmatic approach to conducting rigorous research to assess the impacts of a complex water supply intervention on severe diarrhoeal disease and cholera in an unstable, low-resource setting representative of cholera-affected areas. In particular, we discuss a series of pre-identified risks and linked mitigation strategies as well as the value of combining different data collection methods and preparation of multiple analysis scenarios to account for possible deviations from the protocol. The study described here has the potential to provide robust evidence to support more effective cholera control in challenging, high-burden settings.

Trial Registration: This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02928341 , 10th October 2016) and has received ethics approval from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (8913, 10603) and from the Ethics Committee from the School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (ESP/CE/088/2015).

Citing Articles

Economic cost of a case of diarrhoea in Uvira, Democratic Republic of the Congo: A cost of illness study.

Katana P, Malembaka E, Bugeme P, Saidi J, Cumming O, Gallandat K PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(10):e0011934.

PMID: 39466843 PMC: 11542808. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011934.


Implementing a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in a humanitarian setting: lessons learned from the TISA trial.

NDiaye D, Frison S, Ba M, Le M, Cabo A, Siroma F Trials. 2024; 25(1):620.

PMID: 39300465 PMC: 11414177. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08459-1.


Spatial-temporal analysis of climate and socioeconomic conditions on cholera incidence in Mozambique from 2000 to 2018: an ecological longitudinal retrospective study.

Armando C, Rocklov J, Sidat M, Tozan Y, Mavume A, Bunker A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e082503.

PMID: 39160100 PMC: 11337674. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082503.


Improved water supply infrastructure to reduce acute diarrhoeal diseases and cholera in Uvira, Democratic Republic of the Congo: Results and lessons learned from a pragmatic trial.

Gallandat K, MacDougall A, Jeandron A, Saidi J, Bashige Rumedeka B, Malembaka E PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(7):e0012265.

PMID: 38959264 PMC: 11251581. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012265.


Effectiveness of case-area targeted interventions including vaccination on the control of epidemic cholera: protocol for a prospective observational study.

Ratnayake R, Peyraud N, Ciglenecki I, Gignoux E, Lightowler M, Azman A BMJ Open. 2022; 12(7):e061206.

PMID: 35793924 PMC: 9260795. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061206.

References
1.
Franke M, Ternier R, Jerome J, Matias W, Harris J, Ivers L . Long-term effectiveness of one and two doses of a killed, bivalent, whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Haiti: an extended case-control study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6(9):e1028-e1035. PMC: 6190920. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30284-5. View

2.
Bi Q, Ferreras E, Pezzoli L, Legros D, Ivers L, Date K . Protection against cholera from killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017; 17(10):1080-1088. PMC: 5639147. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30359-6. View

3.
Blanchet K, Ramesh A, Frison S, Warren E, Hossain M, Smith J . Evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises. Lancet. 2017; 390(10109):2287-2296. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30768-1. View

4.
Ali M, Sur D, You Y, Kanungo S, Sah B, Manna B . Herd protection by a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in the slums of Kolkata, India. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 56(8):1123-31. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit009. View

5.
Mukandavire Z, Morris J . Modeling the Epidemiology of Cholera to Prevent Disease Transmission in Developing Countries. Microbiol Spectr. 2015; 3(3). PMC: 4634708. DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VE-0011-2014. View