» Articles » PMID: 34151611

Rehabilitation Variability Following Femoral Condyle and Patellofemoral Microfracture Surgery of the Knee

Overview
Journal Cartilage
Date 2021 Jun 21
PMID 34151611
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the variability of postoperative rehabilitation protocols used by orthopedic surgery residency programs for microfracture of femoral condyle and patellofemoral lesions of the knee.

Design: Online postoperative microfracture rehabilitation protocols from US orthopedic programs and the scientific literature were reviewed. A custom scoring rubric was developed to analyze each protocol for the presence of discrete rehabilitation modalities and the timing of each intervention.

Results: A total of 18 programs (11.6%) from 155 US academic orthopedic programs' published online protocols and a total of 44 protocols were analyzed. Seventeen protocols (56.7%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing for femoral condyle lesions and 17 (89.5%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing for patellofemoral lesions. The average time to permitting weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) was 6.1 weeks (range, 0-8) for femoral condyle lesions and 3.7 weeks (range, 0-8 weeks) for patellofemoral lesions. There was considerable variation in the inclusion and timing of strength, proprioception, agility, and pivoting exercises. For femoral condyle lesions, 10 protocols (33.3%) recommended functional testing prior to return to sport at an average of 23.3 weeks postoperatively (range, 12-32 weeks). For patellofemoral lesions, 4 protocols (20.0%) recommended functional testing for return to sport at an average of 21.0 weeks postoperatively (range, 12-32 weeks).

Conclusion: A minority of US academic orthopedic programs publish microfracture rehabilitation protocols online. Among the protocols currently available, there is significant variability in the inclusion of specific rehabilitation components and timing of many modalities. Evidence-based standardization of elements of postoperative rehabilitation may help improve patient care and subsequent outcomes.

Citing Articles

Dextran-tryamine hydrogel maintains position and integrity under simulated loading in a human cadaver knee model.

van der Weiden G, Mastbergen S, Both S, Karperien M, Lafeber F, van Egmond N Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024; 6(3):100492.

PMID: 38946794 PMC: 11211881. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100492.


Return to Play After Knee Articular Cartilage Restoration: Surgical Options, Rehabilitation Protocols, and Performance Outcomes.

Triana J, Li Z, Rao N, Kingery M, Strauss E Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023; 16(12):575-586.

PMID: 37804418 PMC: 10733247. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-023-09872-w.


Advances in Bioresorbable Triboelectric Nanogenerators.

Kang M, Lee D, Hyun I, Rubab N, Kim S, Kim S Chem Rev. 2023; 123(19):11559-11618.

PMID: 37756249 PMC: 10571046. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00301.


Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee.

Crowley S, Pedersen A, Fortney T, Swindell H, Saltzman B, Popkin C Cartilage. 2022; 13(2):19476035221093071.

PMID: 35762400 PMC: 9247380. DOI: 10.1177/19476035221093071.

References
1.
Fujikawa K, Seedhom B, WRIGHT V . Biomechanics of the patello-femoral joint. Part I: A study of the contact and the congruity of the patello-femoral compartment and movement of the patella. Eng Med. 1983; 12(1):3-11. DOI: 10.1243/emed_jour_1983_012_004_02. View

2.
Wang J, Ashvetiya T, Quaye E, Parakh K, Martin S . Online Health Searches and Their Perceived Effects on Patients and Patient-Clinician Relationships: ASystematic Review. Am J Med. 2018; 131(10):1250.e1-1250.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.04.019. View

3.
Salter R, Simmonds D, Malcolm B, Rumble E, MacMichael D, Clements N . The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage. An experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62(8):1232-51. View

4.
Lightsey H, Wright M, Trofa D, Popkin C, Ahmad C, Redler L . Rehabilitation variability following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Phys Sportsmed. 2018; 46(4):441-448. DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1487240. View

5.
Marder R, Hopkins Jr G, Timmerman L . Arthroscopic microfracture of chondral defects of the knee: a comparison of two postoperative treatments. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(2):152-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.10.009. View