» Articles » PMID: 34150315

No Evidence for Genetic Sex Determination in

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jun 21
PMID 34150315
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mechanisms of sex determination (SD) differ widely across the tree of life. In genotypic sex determination (GSD), genetic elements determine whether individuals are male or female, while in environmental sex determination (ESD), external cues control the sex of the offspring. In cyclical parthenogens, females produce mostly asexual daughters, but environmental stimuli such as crowding, temperature or photoperiod may cause them to produce sons. In aphids, sons are induced by ESD, even though GSD is present, with females carrying two X chromosomes and males only one (X0 SD system). By contrast, although ESD exists in , the two sexes were suggested to be genetically identical, based on a 1972 study on (2n=20) that used three allozyme markers. This study cannot, however, rule out an X0 system, as all three markers may be located on autosomes. Motivated by the life cycle similarities of and aphids, and the absence of karyotype information for males, we tested for GSD (homomorphic sex chromosomes and X0) systems in using a whole-genome approach by comparing males and females of three genotypes. Our results confirm the absence of haploid chromosomes or haploid genomic regions in males as well as the absence of sex-linked genomic regions and sex-specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Within the limitations of the three studied populations here and the methods used, we suggest that our results make the possibility of genetic differences among sexes in the widely used model system very unlikely.

References
1.
Seefeldt L, Ebert D . Temperature- versus precipitation-limitation shape local temperature tolerance in a Holarctic freshwater crustacean. Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 286(1907):20190929. PMC: 6661336. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0929. View

2.
Vicoso B, Kaiser V, Bachtrog D . Sex-biased gene expression at homomorphic sex chromosomes in emus and its implication for sex chromosome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(16):6453-8. PMC: 3631621. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1217027110. View

3.
Li H, Durbin R . Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(5):589-95. PMC: 2828108. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. View

4.
Roco A, Olmstead A, Degitz S, Amano T, Zimmerman L, Bullejos M . Coexistence of Y, W, and Z sex chromosomes in Xenopus tropicalis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(34):E4752-61. PMC: 4553762. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505291112. View

5.
Kato Y, Kobayashi K, Watanabe H, Iguchi T . Environmental sex determination in the branchiopod crustacean Daphnia magna: deep conservation of a Doublesex gene in the sex-determining pathway. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7(3):e1001345. PMC: 3063754. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001345. View