» Articles » PMID: 34149812

Multi-Omics Marker Analysis Enables Early Prediction of Breast Tumor Progression

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2021 Jun 21
PMID 34149812
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ductal carcinoma (DCIS) is a preinvasive form of breast cancer with a highly variable potential of becoming invasive and affecting mortality of the patients. Due to the lack of accurate markers of disease progression, many women with detected DCIS are currently overtreated. To distinguish those DCIS cases who are likely to require therapy from those who should be left untreated, there is a need for robust and predictive biomarkers extracted from molecular or genetic profiles. We developed a supervised machine learning approach that implements multi-omics feature selection and model regularization for the identification of biomarker combinations that could be used to distinguish low-risk DCIS lesions from those with a higher likelihood of progression. To investigate the genetic heterogeneity of disease progression, we applied this approach to 40 pure DCIS and 259 invasive breast cancer (IBC) samples profiled with genome-wide transcriptomics, DNA methylation, and DNA copy number variation. Feature selection using the multi-omics Lasso-regularized algorithm identified both known genes involved in breast cancer development, as well as novel markers for early detection. Even though the gene expression-based model features led to the highest classification accuracy alone, methylation data provided a complementary source of features and improved especially the sensitivity of correctly classifying DCIS cases. We also identified a number of repeatedly misclassified DCIS cases when using either the expression or methylation markers. A small panel of 10 gene markers was able to distinguish DCIS and IBC cases with high accuracy in nested cross-validation (AU-ROC = 0.99). The marker panel was not specific to any of the established breast cancer subtypes, suggesting that the 10-gene signature may provide a subtype-agnostic and cost-effective approach for breast cancer detection and patient stratification. We further confirmed high accuracy of the 10-gene signature in an external validation cohort (AU-ROC = 0.95), profiled using distinct transcriptomic assay, hence demonstrating robustness of the risk signature.

Citing Articles

Multi-omics approaches for understanding gene-environment interactions in noncommunicable diseases: techniques, translation, and equity issues.

Alemu R, Sharew N, Arsano Y, Ahmed M, Tekola-Ayele F, Mersha T Hum Genomics. 2025; 19(1):8.

PMID: 39891174 PMC: 11786457. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-025-00718-9.


CORTADO: Hill Climbing Optimization for Cell-Type Specific Marker Gene Discovery.

Lodi M, Clark L, Roy S, Ghosh P bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763976 PMC: 11703242. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.23.630040.


Cytokine levels in breast cancer are highly dependent on cytomegalovirus (CMV) status.

Spencer J, Liu J, Deyarmin B, Hu H, Shriver C, Somiari S Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 208(3):631-641.

PMID: 39172306 PMC: 11522175. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07459-8.


Minimally invasive biopsy-based diagnostics in support of precision cancer medicine.

Franzen B, Auer G, Lewensohn R Mol Oncol. 2024; 18(11):2612-2628.

PMID: 38519839 PMC: 11547246. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13640.


MMP-11 expression in early luminal breast cancer: associations with clinical, MRI, pathological characteristics, and disease-free survival.

Moliere S, Lodi M, Leblanc S, Gressel A, Mathelin C, Alpy F BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):295.

PMID: 38438841 PMC: 10913243. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11998-0.


References
1.
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R . Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. J Stat Softw. 2010; 33(1):1-22. PMC: 2929880. View

2.
Ambroise C, McLachlan G . Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(10):6562-6. PMC: 124442. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.102102699. View

3.
Virnig B, Tuttle T, Shamliyan T, Kane R . Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102(3):170-8. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp482. View

4.
Nielsen M, Jensen J, Andersen J . Precancerous and cancerous breast lesions during lifetime and at autopsy. A study of 83 women. Cancer. 1984; 54(4):612-5. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(1984)54:4<612::aid-cncr2820540403>3.0.co;2-b. View

5.
Esserman L, Thompson I, Reid B, Nelson P, Ransohoff D, Welch H . Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(6):e234-42. PMC: 4322920. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70598-9. View