» Articles » PMID: 34149645

Identification and Characterization of the CRISPR/Cas System in Strains From Diverse Sources

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas [clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and the CRISPR-associated genes (Cas)] system provides defense mechanisms in bacteria and archaea vs. mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as plasmids and bacteriophages, which can either be harmful or add sequences that can provide virulence or antibiotic resistance. is a Gram-positive bacterium that could be the etiological agent of important soft tissue infections that can lead to bacteremia and sepsis. The role of the CRISPR-Cas system in is not completely understood since there is a lack of knowledge about it. We analyzed 716 genomes and 1 genomic island from GENOMES-NCBI and ENA-EMBL searching for the CRISPR-Cas systems and their spacer sequences (SSs). Our bioinformatic analysis shows that only 0.83% (6/716) of the analyzed genomes harbored the CRISPR-Cas system, all of them were subtype III-A, which is characterized by the presence of the gene. Analysis of SSs showed that 91% (40/44) had no match to annotated MGEs and 9% of SSs corresponded to plasmids and bacteriophages, indicating that those phages had infected those strains. Some of those phages have been proposed as an alternative therapy in biofilm-forming or infection with strains, but these findings indicate that such antibiotic phage strategy would be ineffective. More research about the CRISPR/Cas system is necessary for a bigger number of strains from different sources, so additional features can be studied.

Citing Articles

Controllable self-cleaning FET self-assembled RNA-cleaving DNAzyme based DNA nanotree for culture-free Staphylococcus aureus detection.

Wang H, Chen R, He Y, Zhu X, Yu Z, Feng Z J Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22(1):414.

PMID: 39010059 PMC: 11247881. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02682-3.


A bioinformatic approach to identify confirmed and probable CRISPR-Cas systems in the - complex genomes.

Mancilla-Rojano J, Flores V, Cevallos M, Ochoa S, Parra-Flores J, Arellano-Galindo J Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1335997.

PMID: 38655087 PMC: 11035748. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1335997.


Exploring the Interplay of the CRISPR-CAS System with Antibiotic Resistance in : A Poultry Meat Study from Lahore, Pakistan.

Shabbir M, Ul-Rahman A, Iftikhar M, Rasheed M, Maan M, Sattar A Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(1).

PMID: 38256391 PMC: 10818619. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010130.


Correlation between CRISPR Loci Diversity in Three Enterobacterial Taxa.

Iordache D, Baci G, Caprita O, Farkas A, Lup A, Butiuc-Keul A Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(21).

PMID: 36361556 PMC: 9658729. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232112766.


Whole-Genome Analysis of Isolates from Ready-to-Eat Food in Russia.

Mikhaylova Y, Shelenkov A, Chernyshkov A, Tyumentseva M, Saenko S, Egorova A Foods. 2022; 11(17).

PMID: 36076759 PMC: 9455289. DOI: 10.3390/foods11172574.


References
1.
Lorenz R, Bernhart S, Honer Zu Siederdissen C, Tafer H, Flamm C, Stadler P . ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol Biol. 2011; 6:26. PMC: 3319429. DOI: 10.1186/1748-7188-6-26. View

2.
Tamulaitis G, Venclovas C, Siksnys V . Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity: Major Differences Brushed Aside. Trends Microbiol. 2016; 25(1):49-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.012. View

3.
Makarova K, Wolf Y, Koonin E . Comparative genomics of defense systems in archaea and bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(8):4360-77. PMC: 3632139. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt157. View

4.
Koonin E, Makarova K, Zhang F . Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017; 37:67-78. PMC: 5776717. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008. View

5.
Pourcel C, Touchon M, Villeriot N, Vernadet J, Couvin D, Toffano-Nioche C . CRISPRCasdb a successor of CRISPRdb containing CRISPR arrays and cas genes from complete genome sequences, and tools to download and query lists of repeats and spacers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 48(D1):D535-D544. PMC: 7145573. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz915. View