» Articles » PMID: 34149348

Temporal Characteristics of Visual Processing in Amblyopia

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2021 Jun 21
PMID 34149348
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Amblyopia affects not only spatial vision but also temporal vision. In this study, we aim to investigate temporal processing deficits in amblyopia.

Methods: Twenty amblyopic patients (age: 27.0 ± 5.53 years, 15 males), and 25 normal observers (age: 25.6 ± 4.03 years, 15 males) were recruited in this study. Contrast thresholds in an orientation discrimination task in five target-mask stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) conditions (16.7 ms, 33.4 ms, 50.0 ms, 83.4 ms, and ∞/no noise) were measured. An elaborated perceptual template model (ePTM) was fit to the behavioral data to derive the temporal profile of visual processing for each participant.

Results: There were significant threshold differences between the amblyopic and normal eyes [(1,43) = 10.6, = 0.002] and a significant group × SOA interaction [(2.75,118) = 4.98, = 0.004], suggesting different temporal processing between the two groups. The ePTM fitted the data well ( test, all s > 0.50). Compared to the normal eye, the amblyopic eye had a lower template gain ( = 0.046), and a temporal window with lower peak and broader width (all s < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the observed temporal deficits and visual acuity in amblyopia (s > 0.50). Similar results were found in the anisometropic amblyopia subgroup. No significant difference was found between the fellow eyes of the monocular amblyopia and the normal eyes.

Conclusion: Amblyopia is less efficient in processing dynamic visual stimuli. The temporal deficits in amblyopia, represented by a flattened temporal window, are likely independent of spatial vision deficits.

Citing Articles

Measuring the Interocular Delay and its Link to Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.

Gurman D, Reynaud A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(1):2.

PMID: 38165706 PMC: 10768699. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.1.2.


Reduced interocular suppression after inverse patching in anisometropic amblyopia.

Hu J, Chen J, Ku Y, Yu M Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1280436.

PMID: 38152718 PMC: 10752599. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1280436.


Relationship Between Suppression Scotomas and Stereoacuity in Anisometropic Amblyopia With Successfully Treated Visual Acuity.

Hozumi K, Yagasaki T, Yokoyama Y, Yagasaki A, Haga Y, Eboshita R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(11):16.

PMID: 37561448 PMC: 10424799. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.11.16.


Decomposing the Response Time in Amblyopia: A Drift Diffusion Model Analysis.

Ruan X, Lin L, Ying X, Zhang H, Yuan J, Li C Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(7):25.

PMID: 37318443 PMC: 10278554. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.7.25.


Perceptual learning based on a temporal stimulus enhances visual function in adult amblyopic subjects.

Eisen-Enosh A, Farah N, Polat U, Mandel Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):7643.

PMID: 37169784 PMC: 10175483. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34421-3.


References
1.
Levi D, Klein S . Hyperacuity and amblyopia. Nature. 1982; 298(5871):268-70. DOI: 10.1038/298268a0. View

2.
Hess R, Holliday I . The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia. Vision Res. 1992; 32(7):1319-39. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90225-8. View

3.
Bonneh Y, Sagi D, Polat U . Spatial and temporal crowding in amblyopia. Vision Res. 2007; 47(14):1950-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.015. View

4.
Lu Z, Dosher B . Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: assessing internal representations with external noise. Psychol Rev. 2008; 115(1):44-82. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.44. View

5.
Lu Z, Dosher B . Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1999; 16(3):764-78. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.16.000764. View