Temporal Characteristics of Visual Processing in Amblyopia
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Amblyopia affects not only spatial vision but also temporal vision. In this study, we aim to investigate temporal processing deficits in amblyopia.
Methods: Twenty amblyopic patients (age: 27.0 ± 5.53 years, 15 males), and 25 normal observers (age: 25.6 ± 4.03 years, 15 males) were recruited in this study. Contrast thresholds in an orientation discrimination task in five target-mask stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) conditions (16.7 ms, 33.4 ms, 50.0 ms, 83.4 ms, and ∞/no noise) were measured. An elaborated perceptual template model (ePTM) was fit to the behavioral data to derive the temporal profile of visual processing for each participant.
Results: There were significant threshold differences between the amblyopic and normal eyes [(1,43) = 10.6, = 0.002] and a significant group × SOA interaction [(2.75,118) = 4.98, = 0.004], suggesting different temporal processing between the two groups. The ePTM fitted the data well ( test, all s > 0.50). Compared to the normal eye, the amblyopic eye had a lower template gain ( = 0.046), and a temporal window with lower peak and broader width (all s < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the observed temporal deficits and visual acuity in amblyopia (s > 0.50). Similar results were found in the anisometropic amblyopia subgroup. No significant difference was found between the fellow eyes of the monocular amblyopia and the normal eyes.
Conclusion: Amblyopia is less efficient in processing dynamic visual stimuli. The temporal deficits in amblyopia, represented by a flattened temporal window, are likely independent of spatial vision deficits.
Measuring the Interocular Delay and its Link to Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.
Gurman D, Reynaud A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(1):2.
PMID: 38165706 PMC: 10768699. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.1.2.
Reduced interocular suppression after inverse patching in anisometropic amblyopia.
Hu J, Chen J, Ku Y, Yu M Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1280436.
PMID: 38152718 PMC: 10752599. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1280436.
Hozumi K, Yagasaki T, Yokoyama Y, Yagasaki A, Haga Y, Eboshita R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(11):16.
PMID: 37561448 PMC: 10424799. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.11.16.
Decomposing the Response Time in Amblyopia: A Drift Diffusion Model Analysis.
Ruan X, Lin L, Ying X, Zhang H, Yuan J, Li C Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(7):25.
PMID: 37318443 PMC: 10278554. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.7.25.
Eisen-Enosh A, Farah N, Polat U, Mandel Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):7643.
PMID: 37169784 PMC: 10175483. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34421-3.