» Articles » PMID: 34147585

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Computerized Interpretation Bias Training for Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder: A Fast-Fail Study

Abstract

Objective: To examine targeted, mechanism-based interventions is the next generation of treatment innovation. Biased threat labeling of ambiguous face emotions (interpretation bias) is a potential behavioral treatment target for anger, aggression, and irritability. Changing biases in face-emotion labeling may improve irritability-related outcomes. Here, we report the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled targeted trial of interpretation bias training (IBT) in youths with chronic, severe irritability.

Method: Patients with current disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD; N = 44) were randomly assigned to complete 4 sessions of active (n = 22) or sham (n = 22) computerized IBT training within a 1-week period. The first and last trainings were completed onsite, and 2 trainings were completed at home. We examined the effects of active IBT on labeling bias, primary outcome measures of irritability, and secondary outcome measures of anxiety, depression, and functional impairment. Follow-up assessments were completed immediately after the intervention as well as 1 and 2 weeks later.

Results: We found that active IBT engaged the behavioral target in the active relative to the sham condition, as shown by a significant shift toward labeling ambiguous faces as happy. However, there was no consistent clinical improvement in active IBT relative to the sham condition either immediately after or 2 weeks after training in either the primary or secondary outcome measures.

Conclusion: Although this randomized controlled trial of IBT in youths with DMDD engaged the proposed behavioral target, there was no statistically significant improvement on clinical outcome. Identifying and changing behavioral targets is a first step in novel treatment development; these results have broader implications for target-based intervention development.

Clinical Trial Registration Information: Psychological Treatments for Youth With Severe Irritability; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT02531893.

Citing Articles

Trial protocol for the Building Resilience through Socio-Emotional Training (ReSET) programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a new transdiagnostic preventative intervention for adolescents.

Viding E, Lloyd A, Law R, Martin P, Lucas L, Wu T Trials. 2024; 25(1):143.

PMID: 38395922 PMC: 10885387. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07931-2.


Effect of facial emotion recognition learning transfers across emotions.

Bi T, Luo W, Wu J, Shao B, Tan Q, Kou H Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1310101.

PMID: 38312392 PMC: 10834736. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1310101.


Selecting an Ecological Momentary Assessment Platform: Tutorial for Researchers.

Henry L, Hansen E, Chimoff J, Pokstis K, Kiderman M, Naim R J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e51125.

PMID: 38175682 PMC: 10797510. DOI: 10.2196/51125.


An investigation of the neural basis of anger attributions in irritable youth.

Benda M, DeSerisy M, Levitch C, Roy A Emotion. 2023; 24(4):1068-1077.

PMID: 38127534 PMC: 11116073. DOI: 10.1037/emo0001337.


Mediating effect of amygdala activity on response to fear vs. happiness in youth with significant levels of irritability and disruptive mood and behavior disorders.

Suk J, Blair R, Vaughan B, Lerdahl A, Garvey W, Edwards R Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1204574.

PMID: 37901308 PMC: 10602729. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1204574.


References
1.
Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P . Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997; 36(7):980-8. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021. View

2.
Hyman S . Revolution stalled. Sci Transl Med. 2012; 4(155):155cm11. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003142. View

3.
Stoddard J, Sharif-Askary B, Harkins E, Frank H, Brotman M, Penton-Voak I . An Open Pilot Study of Training Hostile Interpretation Bias to Treat Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016; 26(1):49-57. PMC: 4779288. DOI: 10.1089/cap.2015.0100. View

4.
Menne-Lothmann C, Viechtbauer W, Hohn P, Kasanova Z, Haller S, Drukker M . How to boost positive interpretations? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e100925. PMC: 4072710. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100925. View

5.
Krebs G, Pile V, Grant S, Esposti M, Montgomery P, Lau J . Research Review: Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017; 59(8):831-844. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12809. View