» Articles » PMID: 34141853

Macro-contextual Determinants of Cancer Screening Participation and Inequalities: A Multilevel Analysis of 29 European Countries

Overview
Date 2021 Jun 18
PMID 34141853
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Little attention has been devoted to the role of macro-level determinants in preventive health inequalities, particularly in cancer screening participation. Research has evidenced inequalities in cancer screening uptake yet has mainly focused on the screening programmes' moderating role at the macro-level. To address this gap, this study examines how welfare provision and healthcare system features modify cancer screening uptake and inequalities across European countries.

Methods: Data from 99 715 (Pap smear) and 54 557 (mammography) women in 29 countries from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2014 wave and Swiss Health Interview Survey (SHIS) 2012 wave was analysed. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models, including cross-level interactions, to examine whether social protection expenditure in particular policy areas and healthcare system characteristics explained cross-country differences in Pap smear and mammography uptake and inequalities.

Results: Main findings revealed that GP gatekeeping systems were associated with reduced screening uptake likelihood in both Pap smear and mammography, and so were stronger primary care systems in Pap smear, while higher expenditures on old age and survivors were associated with increased mammography uptake. Cross-level interactions showed that in countries with higher expenditures on sickness/healthcare, disability, social exclusion and public health, and a higher number of GPs, educational inequalities in both Pap smear and mammography uptake were smaller, while higher out-of-pocket payments had the opposite effect of increasing inequalities.

Conclusions: Overall, our results show that social protection policies and healthcare system features affect cancer screening participation. We conclude that institutional and policy arrangements interact with individuals' (educational) resources and, through the (re)distribution of valued goods and resources at the macro level, these arrangements may contribute to enhancing preventive healthcare use and mitigating screening uptake inequalities.

Citing Articles

Geospatial distribution of the adoption of dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Cordes J, Glynn R, Walker A, Schneeweiss S Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2025; 52:100711.

PMID: 39955125 PMC: 11830116. DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2025.100711.


An Evaluation of Rare Cancer Policies in Europe: A Survey Among Healthcare Providers.

Kostadinov K, Iskrov G, Musurlieva N, Stefanov R Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39857946 PMC: 11764363. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020164.


Individual well-being and national determinants of screening mammography among women over fifty.

Hovav B, Brammli-Greenberg S Int J Equity Health. 2025; 24(1):30.

PMID: 39856727 PMC: 11761720. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02389-3.


Socio-economic inequalities in the use of flu vaccination in Europe: a multilevel approach.

Jemna D, David M, Bonnal L, Oros C Health Econ Rev. 2024; 14(1):61.

PMID: 39083186 PMC: 11292999. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1.


Effect of GP visits in the compliance of preventive services: a cross-sectional study in Europe.

Ares-Blanco S, Lopez-Rodriguez J, Polentinos-Castro E, Del Cura-Gonzalez I BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):165.

PMID: 38750446 PMC: 11094967. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02400-w.


References
1.
Burstrom B . The attack on universal health coverage in Europe: different effects in different parts of Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2015; 25(3):366-7. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv073. View

2.
Bergqvist K, Aberg Yngwe M, Lundberg O . Understanding the role of welfare state characteristics for health and inequalities - an analytical review. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:1234. PMC: 3909317. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1234. View

3.
Ramjan L, Cotton A, Algoso M, Peters K . Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening for women with physical disability: A review. Women Health. 2015; 56(2):141-56. DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2015.1086463. View

4.
Beckfield J, Krieger N . Epi + demos + cracy: linking political systems and priorities to the magnitude of health inequities--evidence, gaps, and a research agenda. Epidemiol Rev. 2009; 31:152-77. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxp002. View

5.
Mielck A, Kiess R, von dem Knesebeck O, Stirbu I, Kunst A . Association between forgone care and household income among the elderly in five Western European countries - analyses based on survey data from the SHARE-study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009; 9:52. PMC: 2666678. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-52. View