» Articles » PMID: 34141572

Measuring Outcomes in Rotator Cuff Disorders

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Jun 18
PMID 34141572
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Measuring the outcome of treatment for rotator cuff disorders has evolved over the last three decades. Objective surgeon-derived outcomes such as clinical examination findings and imaging of the rotator cuff have the limitation of marginalising the patients perception of their condition. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have evolved and become popular in an attempt to demonstrate meaningful outcome data. There are a large number in use today and as a result, the heterogeneity of scores used across the literature can make comparison difficult. Patient reported outcome scores can be general health related quality of life scores, joint-specific and disease specific. Qualitative outcomes are also being used now, and these help us to better understand the context of quantitative research scores. In this article, we provide an overview of the outcome measures used in rotator cuff disorders.

Citing Articles

Understanding preoperative health-related quality of life in rotator cuff tear patients: role of patients' characteristics.

Brune D, Stojanov T, Muller A, Weibel D, Hunziker S, Erdbrink S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):992.

PMID: 39633338 PMC: 11619111. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08099-1.


The changing landscape of rotator cuff surgery.

Monga P, Vaishya R J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 19:94-95.

PMID: 34046303 PMC: 8144724. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.024.

References
1.
Tashjian R, Henn R, Kang L, Green A . Effect of medical comorbidity on self-assessed pain, function, and general health status after rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(3):536-40. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00418. View

2.
Michener L, McClure P, Sennett B . American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11(6):587-94. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096. View

3.
Beaton D, Wright J, Katz J . Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(5):1038-46. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060. View

4.
Carr A, Cooper C, Campbell M, Rees J, Moser J, Beard D . Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK Rotator Cuff Surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial]. Health Technol Assess. 2015; 19(80):1-218. PMC: 4781041. DOI: 10.3310/hta19800. View

5.
Noble P, Fuller-Lafreniere S, Meftah M, Dwyer M . Challenges in outcome measurement: discrepancies between patient and provider definitions of success. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(11):3437-45. PMC: 3792266. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3198-x. View