» Articles » PMID: 34135819

Lexical and Phonetic Influences on the Phonolexical Encoding of Difficult Second-Language Contrasts: Insights From Nonword Rejection

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2021 Jun 17
PMID 34135819
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Establishing phonologically robust lexical representations in a second language (L2) is challenging, and even more so for words containing phones in phonological contrasts that are not part of the native language. This study presents a series of additional analyses of lexical decision data assessing the phonolexical encoding of English /ε/ and /æ/ by German learners of English (/æ/ does not exist in German) in order to examine the influence of lexical frequency, phonological neighborhood density and the acoustics of the particular vowels on learners' ability to reject nonwords differing from real words in the confusable L2 phones only (e.g., *l[æ]mon, *dr[ε]gon). Results showed that both the lexical properties of the target items and the acoustics of the critical vowels affected nonword rejection, albeit differently for items with /æ/ → [ε] and /ε/ → [æ] mispronunciations: For the former, lower lexical frequencies and higher neighborhood densities led to more accurate performance. For the latter, it was only the acoustics of the vowel (i.e., how distinctly [æ]-like the mispronunciation was) that had a significant impact on learners' accuracy. This suggests that the encoding of /ε/ and /æ/ may not only be asymmetric in that /ε/ is generally more robustly represented in the lexicon than /æ/, as previously reported, but also in the way in which this encoding takes place. Mainly, the encoding of /æ/ appears to be more dependent on the characteristics of the L2 vocabulary and on one's experience with the L2 than that of its more dominant counterpart (/ε/).

Citing Articles

A brief tablet-based intervention benefits linguistic and communicative abilities in toddlers and preschoolers.

Pena M, Vasquez-Venegas C, Cortes P, Pittaluga E, Herrera M, Pino E NPJ Sci Learn. 2024; 9(1):38.

PMID: 38816493 PMC: 11139856. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-024-00249-3.


Neural correlates of lexical stress processing in a foreign free-stress language.

Schwab S, Mouthon M, Jost L, Salvadori J, Stefanos-Yakoub I, da Silva E Brain Behav. 2022; 13(1):e2854.

PMID: 36573037 PMC: 9847599. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2854.


Fuzzy Lexical Representations in Adult Second Language Speakers.

Gor K, Cook S, Bordag D, Chrabaszcz A, Opitz A Front Psychol. 2022; 12:732030.

PMID: 35027898 PMC: 8751619. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732030.


Vocabulary Size Is a Key Factor in Predicting Second Language Lexical Encoding Accuracy.

Daidone D, Darcy I Front Psychol. 2021; 12:688356.

PMID: 34367013 PMC: 8339215. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688356.

References
1.
Vitevitch M . Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002; 28(2):270-8. PMC: 2553695. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.270. View

2.
Vitevitch M . Naturalistic and experimental analyses of word frequency and neighborhood density effects in slips of the ear. Lang Speech. 2003; 45(Pt 4):407-34. PMC: 2542844. DOI: 10.1177/00238309020450040501. View

3.
Ganong 3rd W . Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1980; 6(1):110-25. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.6.1.110. View

4.
Eger N, Reinisch E . The impact of one's own voice and production skills on word recognition in a second language. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018; 45(3):552-571. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000599. View

5.
Llompart M, Reinisch E . Imitation in a Second Language Relies on Phonological Categories but Does Not Reflect the Productive Usage of Difficult Sound Contrasts. Lang Speech. 2018; 62(3):594-622. DOI: 10.1177/0023830918803978. View