» Articles » PMID: 34135300

Mid- and Long-Term Efficacy of Surgical Treatment of L1-2 Vertebral Tuberculosis with Subdiaphragmatic Extraperitoneal Approach

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2021 Jun 17
PMID 34135300
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BACKGROUND The L1-2 vertebral segment is the most common site of spinal tuberculosis. Traditional thoracoabdominal surgery in this segment risks trauma and complications. This study analyzed the surgical efficacy of the subdiaphragmatic extraperitoneal approach in the treatment of L1-2 spinal tuberculosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of 67 patients with L1-2 vertebral tuberculosis who underwent posterior internal fixation was performed: 35 patients underwent the subdiaphragmatic extraperitoneal approach (group A) and 32 underwent the thoracoabdominal approach (group B). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative nerve function recovery, deformity correction, bone graft fusion, lesion healing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and complications were observed. RESULTS In group A and group B, intraoperative blood loss was 712.00±64.66 mL and 1104.38±131.34 mL; average operation time was 3.16±0.67 h and 5.16±1.07 h; and postoperative hospital stay was 9.60±2.64 days and 13.69±3.87 days, respectively. At 6 months and 5 years after surgery, neurological function, visual analog scale score, and Cobb angle of all patients were significantly improved compared with those before surgery; ESR and CRP decreased to normal levels; lesions completely cured; and all patients had good bone graft fusion. Pulmonary complications occurred in 2 patients in group A and in 14 patients in group B. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of subdiaphragmatic extraperitoneal approach was similar to that of the thoracoabdominal approach for L1-2 spinal tuberculosis, but the former has the advantages of less surgical trauma, shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, and fewer postoperative pulmonary complications.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Clinical Data Between Patients With Complications and Without Complications After Spinal Tuberculosis Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Chen L, Liu C, Ye Z, Chen W, Sun X, Chen J Front Surg. 2022; 9:815303.

PMID: 35425806 PMC: 9002237. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.815303.


Blood transfusion risk prediction in spinal tuberculosis surgery: development and assessment of a novel predictive nomogram.

Chen L, Gan Z, Huang S, Liang T, Sun X, Yi M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):182.

PMID: 35216570 PMC: 8876452. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05132-z.

References
1.
Yin X, Zhou Z, Yu H, Hu X, Guo Q, Zhang H . Comparison between the antero-posterior and posterior only approaches for treating thoracolumbar tuberculosis (T10-L2) with kyphosis in children: a minimum 3-year follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015; 32(1):127-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-015-2935-8. View

2.
Baaj A, Papadimitriou K, Amin A, Kretzer R, Wolinsky J, Ziya L Gokaslan . Surgical anatomy of the diaphragm in the anterolateral approach to the spine: a cadaveric study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014; 27(4):220-3. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a18125. View

3.
Zhou Y, Li W, Liu J, Gong L, Luo J . Comparison of single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation with single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis. BMC Surg. 2018; 18(1):71. PMC: 6122740. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-018-0405-4. View

4.
Shi J, Yue X, Niu N, Zhao C, Qiu H, Wang Z . Application of a modified thoracoabdominal approach that avoids cutting open the costal portion of diaphragm during anterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2016; 26(7):1852-1861. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4917-2. View

5.
Kim M, Nolan P, Finkelstein J . Evaluation of 11th rib extrapleural-retroperitoneal approach to the thoracolumbar junction. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93(1 Suppl):168-74. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2000.93.1.0168. View