Comparison of SIRS Criteria and QSOFA Score for Identifying Culture-positive Sepsis in the Emergency Department: a Prospective Cross-sectional Multicentre Study

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2021 Jun 17

PMID 34135028

Citations 6

Authors

Lisette Mignot-Evers

Vivian Raaijmakers

Gerba Buunk

Steffie Brouns

Lorenzo Romano

Thijs van Herpt

Arvind Gharbharan

Jeanne Dieleman

Harm Haak

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the daily practice of two emergency departments (ED) in the Netherlands, where systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score are used differently as screening tools for culture-positive sepsis.

Design: A prospective cross-sectional multicentre study.

Setting: Two EDs at two European clinical teaching hospitals in the Netherlands.

Participants: 760 patients with suspected infection who met SIRS criteria or had a qualifying qSOFA score who were treated at two EDs in the Netherlands from 1 January to 1 March 2018 were included.

Methods: SIRS criteria and qSOFA score were calculated for each patient. The first hospital treated the patients who met SIRS criteria following the worldwide Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocol. At the second hospital, only patients who met the qualifying qSOFA score received this treatment. Therefore, patients could be divided into five groups: (1) SIRS+, qSOFA-, not treated according to protocol (reference group); (2) SIRS+, qSOFA-, treated according to protocol; (3) SIRS+, qSOFA+, treated according to protocol; (4) SIRS-, qSOFA+, not treated according to protocol; (5) SIRS-, qSOFA+, treated according to protocol.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: To prove culture-positive sepsis was present, cultures were used as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Results: 98.9% met SIRS criteria and 11.7% met qSOFA score. Positive predictive values of SIRS criteria and qSOFA score were 41.2% (95% CI 37.4% to 45.2%) and 48.1% (95% CI 37.4% to 58.9%), respectively. HRs were 0.79 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.56, p=0.500), 3.42 (95% CI 1.82 to 6.44, p<0.001), 18.94 (95% CI 2.48 to 144.89, p=0.005) and 4.97 (95% CI 1.44 to 17.16, p=0.011) for groups 2-5, respectively.

Conclusion: qSOFA score performed as well as SIRS criteria for identifying culture-positive sepsis and performed significantly better for predicting in-hospital mortality and ICU admission. This study shows that SIRS criteria are no longer necessary and recommends qSOFA score as the standard for identifying culture-positive sepsis in the ED.

Trial Registration Number: NL8315.

Citing Articles

Predicting mortality in febrile adults: comparative performance of the MEWS, qSOFA, and UVA scores using prospectively collected data among patients in four health-care sites in sub-Saharan Africa and South-Eastern Asia.

Lal S, Luangraj M, Keddie S, Ashley E, Baerenbold O, Bassat Q EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 77:102856.

PMID: 39416389 PMC: 11474423. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102856.

Early sclerostin assessment in frail elderly patients with sepsis: insights on short- and long-term mortality prediction.

Tirandi A, Arboscello E, Ministrini S, Liberale L, Bonaventura A, Vecchie A Intern Emerg Med. 2023; 18(5):1509-1519.

PMID: 36943596 PMC: 10412666. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-023-03223-w.

Classifying sepsis from photoplethysmography.

Lombardi S, Partanen P, Francia P, Calamai I, Deodati R, Luchini M Health Inf Sci Syst. 2022; 10(1):30.

PMID: 36330224 PMC: 9622958. DOI: 10.1007/s13755-022-00199-3.

Predictive Value of Systemic Immune-inflammation Index in Determining Mortality in COVID-19 Patients.

Karaaslan T, Karaaslan E J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2022; 8(3):156-164.

PMID: 36062039 PMC: 9396947. DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2022-0013.

Retrospective Analysis of the Risk Factors and Drug Resistance of Pathogenic Bacteria in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Impacted Ureteral Calculi.

Yuan Q, Guo J, He L, Chen Q, Zou X, Yang S Int J Gen Med. 2022; 15:3923-3931.

PMID: 35440871 PMC: 9013414. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S356540.

References

Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B . Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2002; 345(19):1368-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307. View

Rodriguez R, Greenwood J, Nuckton T, Darger B, Shofer F, Troeger D . Comparison of qSOFA with current emergency department tools for screening of patients with sepsis for critical illness. Emerg Med J. 2018; 35(6):350-356. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207383. View

Alam N, Oskam E, Stassen P, van Exter P, van de Ven P, Haak H . Prehospital antibiotics in the ambulance for sepsis: a multicentre, open label, randomised trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017; 6(1):40-50. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30469-1. View

Saeed K, Wilson D, Bloos F, Schuetz P, van der Does Y, Melander O . The early identification of disease progression in patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department: a multi-centre derivation and validation study. Crit Care. 2019; 23(1):40. PMC: 6368690. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2329-5. View

Franchini S, Scarallo L, Carlucci M, Cabrini L, Tresoldi M . SIRS or qSOFA? Is that the question? Clinical and methodological observations from a meta-analysis and critical review on the prognostication of patients with suspected sepsis outside the ICU. Intern Emerg Med. 2018; 14(4):593-602. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-018-1965-0. View

Haydar S, Spanier M, Weems P, Wood S, Strout T . Comparison of QSOFA score and SIRS criteria as screening mechanisms for emergency department sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35(11):1730-1733. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.07.001. View

Liu Y, Luo Y, Zhang X, Shou S, Gao Y, Lu B . Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment as a prognostic factor for infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intern Emerg Med. 2019; 14(4):603-615. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-019-02036-0. View

Donnelly J, Safford M, Shapiro N, Baddley J, Wang H . Application of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis (Sepsis-3) Classification: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017; 17(6):661-670. PMC: 5449202. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30117-2. View

Song J, Sin C, Park H, Shim S, Lee J . Performance of the quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2018; 22(1):28. PMC: 5802050. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-1952-x. View

10.

Askim A, Moser F, Gustad L, Stene H, Gundersen M, Asvold B . Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017; 25(1):56. PMC: 5466747. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-017-0399-4. View

11.

Kaukonen K, Bailey M, Pilcher D, Cooper D, Bellomo R . Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(17):1629-38. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415236. View

12.

Fernando S, Tran A, Taljaard M, Cheng W, Rochwerg B, Seely A . Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 168(4):266-275. DOI: 10.7326/M17-2820. View

13.

Gupta A, Liu T, Shepherd S, Paiva W . Using Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Evaluate the Prognostic Accuracy of SIRS and qSOFA. Healthc Inform Res. 2018; 24(2):139-147. PMC: 5944188. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2018.24.2.139. View

14.

Seymour C, Liu V, Iwashyna T, Brunkhorst F, Rea T, Scherag A . Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):762-74. PMC: 5433435. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288. View

15.

Brink A, Alsma J, Verdonschot R, Rood P, Zietse R, Lingsma H . Predicting mortality in patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department; A retrospective cohort study comparing qSOFA, SIRS and National Early Warning Score. PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0211133. PMC: 6347138. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211133. View

16.

Quinten V, van Meurs M, Wolffensperger A, Ter Maaten J, Ligtenberg J . Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?. Eur J Emerg Med. 2017; 25(5):328-334. PMC: 6133213. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460. View

17.

Peake S, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R . Potential Impact of the 2016 Consensus Definitions of Sepsis and Septic Shock on Future Sepsis Research. Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 70(4):553-561.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.007. View

18.

Rudd K, Seymour C, Aluisio A, Augustin M, Bagenda D, Beane A . Association of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score With Excess Hospital Mortality in Adults With Suspected Infection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. JAMA. 2018; 319(21):2202-2211. PMC: 6134436. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.6229. View

19.

Fernando S, Rochwerg B, Seely A . Clinical implications of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). CMAJ. 2018; 190(36):E1058-E1059. PMC: 6131078. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170149. View

20.

Harimtepathip P, Lee J, Griffith E, Williams G, Patel R, Lebowitz D . Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Versus Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria for Predicting Organ Dysfunction and Mortality. Cureus. 2019; 10(10):e3511. PMC: 6314391. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3511. View