» Articles » PMID: 34133724

United States Medicolegal Progress and Innovation in Telemedicine in the Age of COVID-19: A Primer for Neurosurgeons

Overview
Journal Neurosurgery
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2021 Jun 16
PMID 34133724
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Telemedicine has received increased attention in recent years as a potential solution to expand clinical capability and patient access to care in many fields, including neurosurgery. Although patient and physician attitudes are rapidly shifting toward greater telemedicine use in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, there remains uncertainty about telemedicine's regulatory future. Despite growing evidence of telemedicine's utility, there remain a number of significant medicolegal barriers to its mass adoption and wider implementation. Herein, we examine recent progress in state and federal regulations in the United States governing telemedicine's implementation in quality of care, finance and billing, privacy and confidentiality, risk and liability, and geography and interstate licensure, with special attention to how these concern teleneurosurgical practice. We also review contemporary topics germane to the future of teleneurosurgery, including the continued expansion of reciprocity in interstate licensure, expanded coverage for homecare services for chronic conditions, expansion of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursements, and protections of store-and-forward technologies. Additionally, we discuss recent successes in teleneurosurgery, stroke care, and rehabilitation as models for teleneurosurgical best practices. As telemedicine technology continues to mature and its expanse grows, neurosurgeons' familiarity with its benefits, limitations, and controversies will best allow for its successful adoption in our field to maximize patient care and outcomes.

Citing Articles

Reply to GSJ Letter to Editor: Telemedicine in Spine Surgery: Global Perspectives and Practices.

Riew G, Iyer S Global Spine J. 2022; 12(6):1308-1309.

PMID: 35477315 PMC: 9210247. DOI: 10.1177/21925682221091792.


Remote neuro-endovascular consultation using a secure telemedicine system: A feasibility study.

Ishibashi T, Kaku S, Sonoda S, Murayama Y Surg Neurol Int. 2022; 13:47.

PMID: 35242413 PMC: 8888291. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_1165_2021.


The Utility of Remote Video Technology in Continuing Neurosurgical Care in the COVID-19 Era: Reflections from the Past Year.

Sharma A, Winkelman R, Schlenk R, Rasmussen P, Angelov L, Benzil D World Neurosurg. 2021; 156:43-52.

PMID: 34509681 PMC: 8428034. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.145.

References
1.
Huang E, Knight S, Guetter C, Davis C, Moller M, Slama E . Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: A narrative review. Am J Surg. 2019; 218(4):760-766. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.018. View

2.
Whetten J, van der Goes D, Tran H, Moffett M, Semper C, Yonas H . Cost-effectiveness of Access to Critical Cerebral Emergency Support Services (ACCESS): a neuro-emergent telemedicine consultation program. J Med Econ. 2018; 21(4):398-405. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1426591. View

3.
Schimpf B, Deanda K, Severenuk D, Montgomery T, Cooley G, Kowalski R . Integration of Real-Time Electronic Health Records and Wireless Technology in a Mobile Stroke Unit. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019; 28(9):2530-2536. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.06.008. View

4.
Thompson J . The future of medical licensure in the United States. Acad Med. 2006; 81(12 Suppl):S36-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000243351.57047.2e. View

5.
Chuchvara N, Patel R, Srivastava R, Reilly C, Rao B . The growth of teledermatology: Expanding to reach the underserved. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 82(4):1025-1033. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.11.055. View