» Articles » PMID: 34129646

Promoting Inclusive Metrics of Success and Impact to Dismantle a Discriminatory Reward System in Science

Abstract

Success and impact metrics in science are based on a system that perpetuates sexist and racist "rewards" by prioritizing citations and impact factors. These metrics are flawed and biased against already marginalized groups and fail to accurately capture the breadth of individuals' meaningful scientific impacts. We advocate shifting this outdated value system to advance science through principles of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. We outline pathways for a paradigm shift in scientific values based on multidimensional mentorship and promoting mentee well-being. These actions will require collective efforts supported by academic leaders and administrators to drive essential systemic change.

Citing Articles

Improving the diversity of the PLOS ONE editorial board.

Ei Cho S, Chenette E PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308492.

PMID: 39186479 PMC: 11346648. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308492.


Extending the case for a "health disparities research industrial complex": A response to Ezell.

Mrig E, Spencer K Soc Sci Med. 2024; 351:116622.

PMID: 38879346 PMC: 11498142. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116622.


Monitoring Open Science as transformative change: Towards a systemic framework.

Rafols I, Meijer I, Molas-Gallart J F1000Res. 2024; 13:320.

PMID: 38854438 PMC: 11157193. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.148290.1.


Ten recommendations for hosting a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) journal club.

Diaz R, Wankowicz S PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(6):e1012166.

PMID: 38843155 PMC: 11156311. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012166.


Centering relationships to place for more meaningful research and engagement.

Beaty F, Dominguez-Sanchez P, Nalven K, Palacios-Abrantes J, Oken K, Ban N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(25):e2306991121.

PMID: 38830112 PMC: 11194485. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2306991121.


References
1.
Crane D . Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition. Am Sociol Rev. 1965; 30(5):699-714. View

2.
Hofstra B, Kulkarni V, Galvez S, He B, Jurafsky D, McFarland D . The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(17):9284-9291. PMC: 7196824. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1915378117. View

3.
Clancy K, Cortina L, Kirkland A . Opinion: Use science to stop sexual harassment in higher education. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(37):22614-22618. PMC: 7502731. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016164117. View

4.
Holman L, Stuart-Fox D, Hauser C . The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?. PLoS Biol. 2018; 16(4):e2004956. PMC: 5908072. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956. View

5.
Chaudhary V, Berhe A . Ten simple rules for building an antiracist lab. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020; 16(10):e1008210. PMC: 7529192. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008210. View