Changes in Biceps Femoris Long Head Fascicle Length After 10-d Bed Rest Assessed with Different Ultrasound Methods

Overview

Journal Med Sci Sports Exerc

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2021 Jun 15

PMID 34127637

Citations 8

Authors

Fabio Sarto

Elena Monti

Bostjan Simunic

Rado Pisot

Marco V Narici

Martino V Franchi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the changes in fascicle length (Lf) of biceps femoris long head (BFlh) after 10 d of bed rest (BR) by comparing four different ultrasound (US) methods.

Methods: Ten healthy men participated in 10-d BR. Before (BR0) and after (BR10) the BR period, BFlh Lf values were obtained using 1) extended-field-of-view (EFOV) technique, 2) the manual linear extrapolation (MLE) method, and 3) two trigonometric equations (equations A and B) from a single US image.

Results: After BR10, decreased Lf values were observed by EFOV (P < 0.001; Hedges' g = 0.29) and MLE (P = 0.0082; g = 0.22) methods, but not with equations A and B. Differences between equation A and the other US methods were detected at both time points. The percentage of changes in Lf between BR0 and BR10 was influenced by the US methods applied, with difference detected between the changes measured by EFOV and the ones estimated by equation A (P = 0.04; g = 0.53). Bland-Altman analyses revealed relevant average absolute biases in Lf between EFOV and other methods at both time points (range BR0-BR10: MLE, 0.3-0.37 cm (3.4%-4.32%); equation B, 0.3-0.48 cm (3.24%-5.41%); equation A, 2.44-2.97 cm (24.05%-29.2%)). A significant correlation (r = 0.83) in percentage of change in Lf values was observed only between EFOV and MLE.

Conclusions: We showed that four distinct US methods lead to different results in the assessment of BFlh Lf changes after a short-term period of unloading. The implementation of EFOV technique (or alternatively MLE) to assess Lf changes in BFlh during longitudinal studies is warranted.

Citing Articles

Addressing the Paradox of Rest with Innovative Technologies.

Pisot R, Marusic U, Slosar L Zdr Varst. 2025; 64(2):68-72.

PMID: 40026370 PMC: 11870318. DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2025-0009.

The Structural Adaptations That Mediate Disuse-Induced Atrophy of Skeletal Muscle.

Sayed R, Hibbert J, Jorgenson K, Hornberger T Cells. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38132132 PMC: 10741885. DOI: 10.3390/cells12242811.

Ultrasonographic measurements of fascicle length overestimate adaptations in serial sarcomere number.

Hinks A, Franchi M, Power G Exp Physiol. 2023; 108(10):1308-1324.

PMID: 37608723 PMC: 10988429. DOI: 10.1113/EP091334.

Systematic Comparison of Muscle Ultrasound Thickness in Polyneuropathies and Other Neuromuscular Diseases.

Alnajjar S, Fathihelabad D, Abraham A, Daniyal L, Lovblom L, Bril V Neurol Ther. 2023; 12(5):1623-1630.

PMID: 37338783 PMC: 10444740. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00485-6.

Reliability and accuracy of ultrasound image analyses completed manually an automated tool.

Wohlgemuth K, Blue M, Mota J PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13609.

PMID: 35729910 PMC: 9206842. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13609.

References

Ribeiro-Alvares J, Marques V, Vaz M, Baroni B . Four Weeks of Nordic Hamstring Exercise Reduce Muscle Injury Risk Factors in Young Adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2017; 32(5):1254-1262. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001975. View

Tosovic D, Muirhead J, Brown J, Woodley S . Anatomy of the long head of biceps femoris: An ultrasound study. Clin Anat. 2016; 29(6):738-45. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22718. View

Mendiguchia J, Conceicao F, Edouard P, Fonseca M, Pereira R, Lopes H . Sprint versus isolated eccentric training: Comparative effects on hamstring architecture and performance in soccer players. PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0228283. PMC: 7012429. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228283. View

Duhig S, Bourne M, Buhmann R, Williams M, Minett G, Roberts L . Effect of concentric and eccentric hamstring training on sprint recovery, strength and muscle architecture in inexperienced athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2019; 22(7):769-774. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.01.010. View

Freitas S, Marmeleira J, Valamatos M, Blazevich A, Mil-Homens P . Ultrasonographic Measurement of the Biceps Femoris Long-Head Muscle Architecture. J Ultrasound Med. 2017; 37(4):977-986. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14436. View

e Lima K, Carneiro S, Alves D, Peixinho C, de Oliveira L . Assessment of muscle architecture of the biceps femoris and vastus lateralis by ultrasound after a chronic stretching program. Clin J Sport Med. 2014; 25(1):55-60. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000069. View

Seymore K, Domire Z, DeVita P, Rider P, Kulas A . The effect of Nordic hamstring strength training on muscle architecture, stiffness, and strength. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017; 117(5):943-953. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3583-3. View

Franchi M, Fitze D, Raiteri B, Hahn D, Sporri J . Ultrasound-derived Biceps Femoris Long Head Fascicle Length: Extrapolation Pitfalls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019; 52(1):233-243. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002123. View

Pimenta R, Blazevich A, Freitas S . Biceps Femoris Long-Head Architecture Assessed Using Different Sonographic Techniques. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018; 50(12):2584-2594. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001731. View

10.

Simunic B, Koren K, Rittweger J, Lazzer S, Reggiani C, Rejc E . Tensiomyography detects early hallmarks of bed-rest-induced atrophy before changes in muscle architecture. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019; 126(4):815-822. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00880.2018. View

11.

Blazevich A, Cannavan D, Coleman D, Horne S . Influence of concentric and eccentric resistance training on architectural adaptation in human quadriceps muscles. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007; 103(5):1565-75. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00578.2007. View

12.

Timmins R, Bourne M, Shield A, Williams M, Lorenzen C, Opar D . Short biceps femoris fascicles and eccentric knee flexor weakness increase the risk of hamstring injury in elite football (soccer): a prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 50(24):1524-1535. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095362. View

13.

Miles M, Heil D, Larson K, Conant S, Schneider S . Prior resistance training and sex influence muscle responses to arm suspension. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(11):1983-9. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000176302.99185.be. View

14.

McMahon G, Morse C, Burden A, Winwood K, Onambele G . Impact of range of motion during ecologically valid resistance training protocols on muscle size, subcutaneous fat, and strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2013; 28(1):245-55. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318297143a. View

15.

Guex K, Degache F, Morisod C, Sailly M, Millet G . Hamstring Architectural and Functional Adaptations Following Long vs. Short Muscle Length Eccentric Training. Front Physiol. 2016; 7:340. PMC: 4971444. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00340. View

16.

Lacome M, Avrillon S, Cholley Y, Simpson B, Guilhem G, Buchheit M . Hamstring Eccentric Strengthening Program: Does Training Volume Matter?. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019; 15(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0947. View

17.

Franchi M, Raiteri B, Longo S, Sinha S, Narici M, Csapo R . Muscle Architecture Assessment: Strengths, Shortcomings and New Frontiers of in Vivo Imaging Techniques. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018; 44(12):2492-2504. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.07.010. View

18.

Timmins R, Ruddy J, Presland J, Maniar N, Shield A, Williams M . Architectural Changes of the Biceps Femoris Long Head after Concentric or Eccentric Training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015; 48(3):499-508. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000795. View

19.

Blazevich A . Effects of physical training and detraining, immobilisation, growth and aging on human fascicle geometry. Sports Med. 2006; 36(12):1003-17. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200636120-00002. View

20.

Franchi M, Fitze D, Hanimann J, Sarto F, Sporri J . Panoramic ultrasound vs. MRI for the assessment of hamstrings cross-sectional area and volume in a large athletic cohort. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):14144. PMC: 7445237. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71123-6. View