A Comparison of Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - Meta-analysis of Propensity Score-matched Data
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Optimal management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) has been heavily debated in the literature. The aim of this review is to assess comparative outcomes from propensity-matched studies of endovascular versus open for rAAA.
Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE and Embase) were searched in January 2021 using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search interface. Eligible studies compared endovascular versus open repair for rAAA using propensity-matched cohorts. Pooled estimates of perioperative outcomes were calculated using odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. Time-to-event data meta-analysis was conducted using the inverse-variance method and reported as summary hazard ratio (HR) and associated 95% CI. The quality of evidence was graded using a system developed by the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group.
Results: Six studies published between 2010 and 2020 were selected for qualitative and quantitative synthesis, reporting a total of 6731 patients. The odds of perioperative mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) were significantly lower than after open surgical repair (OSR) (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41-0.65). The hazard of overall mortality during follow-up was lower, although not significantly, after EVAR than after OSR (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62-1.01). The odds of acute kidney injury and early aneurysm-related reintervention were both significantly lower after EVAR than after OSR (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.78 and OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.98, respectively). Patients treated with EVAR stayed in hospital for significantly less time than those treated with OSR (MD -5.13, 95% CI -7.94 to -2.32). The certainty of the body of evidence for perioperative mortality was low and for overall mortality was very low.
Conclusion: The evidence suggests that EVAR confers a significant benefit on perioperative mortality.
Umegaki T, Kunisawa S, Kamibayashi T, Fushimi K, Imanaka Y Ann Vasc Dis. 2024; 17(4):351-357.
PMID: 39726556 PMC: 11669037. DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.24-00043.
Cherian A, Venu R, Raja P, Saravanan S, Khan U, Kantawala R Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63183.
PMID: 39070498 PMC: 11273335. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63183.
Fu X, Yuan J Heliyon. 2023; 9(12):e22938.
PMID: 38076058 PMC: 10703705. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22938.
Duran M, Arnautovic A, Kilic C, Rembe J, Mulorz J, Schelzig H J Clin Med. 2023; 12(22).
PMID: 38002798 PMC: 10672125. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227186.
Urgent and emergent repair of complex aortic aneurysms using an off-the-shelf branched device.
Nana P, Spanos K, Jakimowicz T, Torrealba J, Jama K, Panuccio G Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1277459.
PMID: 37808886 PMC: 10556233. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1277459.