» Articles » PMID: 34125078

A Bayesian Approach to Tissue-fraction Estimation for Oncological PET Segmentation

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2021 Jun 14
PMID 34125078
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tumor segmentation in oncological PET is challenging, a major reason being the partial-volume effects (PVEs) that arise due to low system resolution and finite voxel size. The latter results in tissue-fraction effects (TFEs), i.e. voxels contain a mixture of tissue classes. Conventional segmentation methods are typically designed to assign each image voxel as belonging to a certain tissue class. Thus, these methods are inherently limited in modeling TFEs. To address the challenge of accounting for PVEs, and in particular, TFEs, we propose a Bayesian approach to tissue-fraction estimation for oncological PET segmentation. Specifically, this Bayesian approach estimates the posterior mean of the fractional volume that the tumor occupies within each image voxel. The proposed method, implemented using a deep-learning-based technique, was first evaluated using clinically realistic 2D simulation studies with known ground truth, in the context of segmenting the primary tumor in PET images of patients with lung cancer. The evaluation studies demonstrated that the method accurately estimated the tumor-fraction areas and significantly outperformed widely used conventional PET segmentation methods, including a U-net-based method, on the task of segmenting the tumor. In addition, the proposed method was relatively insensitive to PVEs and yielded reliable tumor segmentation for different clinical-scanner configurations. The method was then evaluated using clinical images of patients with stage IIB/III non-small cell lung cancer from ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 multi-center clinical trial. Here, the results showed that the proposed method significantly outperformed all other considered methods and yielded accurate tumor segmentation on patient images with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.86). In particular, the method accurately segmented relatively small tumors, yielding a high DSC of 0.77 for the smallest segmented cross-section of 1.30 cm. Overall, this study demonstrates the efficacy of the proposed method to accurately segment tumors in PET images.

Citing Articles

Investigating the Impact of Voxel Size and Postfiltering on Quantitative Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study.

Mohymen A, Farag H, Reda S, Monem A, Ali S J Med Phys. 2025; 49(4):597-607.

PMID: 39926131 PMC: 11801078. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_123_24.


Need for Objective Task-Based Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms for Quantitative PET: A Study with ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 Multicenter Clinical Trial Data.

Liu Z, Mhlanga J, Xia H, Siegel B, Jha A J Nucl Med. 2024; 65(3).

PMID: 38360049 PMC: 10924158. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266018.


Need for objective task-based evaluation of AI-based segmentation methods for quantitative PET.

Liu Z, Mhlanga J, Siegel B, Jha A Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2023; 12467.

PMID: 37990707 PMC: 10659582. DOI: 10.1117/12.2647894.


Carotid atherosclerotic plaque segmentation in multi-weighted MRI using a two-stage neural network: advantages of training with high-resolution imaging and histology.

Li R, Zheng J, Zayed M, Saffitz J, Woodard P, Jha A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1127653.

PMID: 37293278 PMC: 10244753. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1127653.


Observer-study-based approaches to quantitatively evaluate the realism of synthetic medical images.

Liu Z, Wolfe S, Yu Z, Laforest R, Mhlanga J, Fraum T Phys Med Biol. 2023; 68(7).

PMID: 36863028 PMC: 10411234. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acc0ce.


References
1.
Foster B, Bagci U, Mansoor A, Xu Z, Mollura D . A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images. Comput Biol Med. 2014; 50:76-96. PMC: 4060809. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.04.014. View

2.
Hatt M, Rest C, Turzo A, Roux C, Visvikis D . A fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian segmentation approach for volume determination in PET. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 28(6):881-93. PMC: 2912931. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2008.2012036. View

3.
Cook G, Azad G, Owczarczyk K, Siddique M, Goh V . Challenges and Promises of PET Radiomics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 102(4):1083-1089. PMC: 6278749. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.268. View

4.
Dewalle-Vignion A, Betrouni N, Baillet C, Vermandel M . Is STAPLE algorithm confident to assess segmentation methods in PET imaging?. Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60(24):9473-91. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/24/9473. View

5.
Barrett H, Wilson D, Kupinski M, Aguwa K, Ewell L, Hunter R . Therapy Operating Characteristic (TOC) Curves and their Application to the Evaluation of Segmentation Algorithms. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010; 7627:76270Z. PMC: 2952955. DOI: 10.1117/12.844189. View