» Articles » PMID: 34124345

Renal Protective Effect of Everolimus in Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Randomized Open-Label Trial

Abstract

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing EVR and mycophenolic acid (MPA) with CNI and MPA immunosuppression. An Investigational New Drug Application (IND # 113882) was obtained with the Food and Drug Administration as EVR is only approved for use with low-dose tacrolimus. Serum creatinine, 24-hour urine creatinine clearance, iothalamate clearance, Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrCl), and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimated glomerular filtration rate were prospectively measured at 4 study visits. Nonparametric statistical tests were used for analyses, including the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous outcomes and Pearson's chi-square test for binary outcomes. Effect size was measured using Cohen's . Patients also completed quality of life surveys using the FACT-Hep instrument at each study visit. Comparison between the 2 groups was performed using the Student test.

Results: Each arm had 12 subjects; 4 patients dropped out in the EVR arm and 1 in the CNI arm by 24 months. Serum creatinine ( = 0.015), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimated glomerular filtration rate ( = 0.013), and 24-hour urine CrCL ( = 0.032) were significantly better at 24 months with EVR. Iothalamate clearance showed significant improvement at 12 months ( = 0.049) and a trend toward better renal function ( = 0.099) at 24 months. There was no statistical significance with Cockcroft-Gault CrCl. Adverse events were not significantly different between the 2 arms. The EVR group also showed significantly better physical, functional, and overall self-reported quality of life ( = 0.01) at 24 months.

Conclusions: EVR with MPA resulted in significant long-term improvement in renal function and quality of life at 24 months after liver transplantation compared with standard CNI with MPA immunosuppression.

Citing Articles

Immunosuppression in liver transplant oncology: position paper of the Italian Board of Experts in Liver Transplantation (I-BELT).

Cillo U, Carraro A, Avolio A, Cescon M, Di Benedetto F, Giannelli V Updates Surg. 2024; 76(3):725-741.

PMID: 38713396 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01845-z.


Basics and Art of Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation.

Poudel S, Gupta S, Saigal S J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024; 14(3):101345.

PMID: 38450290 PMC: 10912712. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101345.


The Role of mTOR Inhibitors after Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Todeschini L, Cristin L, Martinino A, Mattia A, Agnes S, Giovinazzo F Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(6):5574-5592.

PMID: 37366904 PMC: 10297627. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060421.

References
1.
Dumortier J, Dharancy S, Calmus Y, Duvoux C, Durand F, Salame E . Use of everolimus in liver transplantation: The French experience. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2016; 30(3):161-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2015.12.003. View

2.
Trinh E, Alam A, Tchervenkov J, Cantarovich M . Impact of acute kidney injury following liver transplantation on long-term outcomes. Clin Transplant. 2016; 31(1). DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12863. View

3.
Huyghe E, Zairi A, Nohra J, Kamar N, Plante P, Rostaing L . Gonadal impact of target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) in male patients: an overview. Transpl Int. 2007; 20(4):305-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00423.x. View

4.
Trotter J, Lizardo-Sanchez L . Everolimus in liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2014; 19(6):578-82. DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000127. View

5.
Heffernan N, Cella D, Webster K, Odom L, Martone M, Passik S . Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with hepatobiliary cancers: the functional assessment of cancer therapy-hepatobiliary questionnaire. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(9):2229-39. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.07.093. View