Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task

Overview

Journal Front Psychiatry

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2021 Jun 14

PMID 34122188

Authors

James M Bjork

Lori Keyser-Marcus

Jasmin Vassileva

Tatiana Ramey

David C Houghton

F Gerard Moeller

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Positive social connections are crucial for recovery from Substance Use Disorder (SUD). Of interest is understanding potential social information processing (SIP) mediators of this effect. To explore whether persons with different SUD show idiosyncratic biases toward social signals, we administered an emotional go-nogo task (EGNG) to 31 individuals with Cocaine Use Disorder (CoUD), 31 with Cannabis Use Disorder (CaUD), 79 with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), and 58 controls. Participants were instructed to respond to emotional faces (Fear/Happy) but withhold responses to expressionless faces in two task blocks, with the reverse instruction in the other two blocks. Emotional faces as non-targets elicited more "false alarm" (FA) commission errors as a main effect. Groups did not differ in overall rates of hits (correct responses to target faces), but participants with CaUD and CoUD showed reduced rates of hits (relative to controls) when expressionless faces were targets. OUD participants had worse hit rates [and slower reaction times (RT)] when fearful faces (but not happy faces) were targets. CaUD participants were most affected by instruction effects (respond/"go" vs withhold response/"no-go" to emotional face) on discriminability statistic A. Participants were faster to respond to happy face targets than to expressionless faces. However, this pattern was reversed in fearful face blocks in OUD and CoUD participants. This experiment replicated previous findings of the greater salience of expressive face images, and extends this finding to SUD, where persons with CaUD may show even greater bias toward emotional faces. Conversely, OUD participants showed idiosyncratic behavior in response to fearful faces suggestive of increased attentional disruption by fear. These data suggest a mechanism by which positive social signals may contribute to recovery.

References

Bayrakci A, Sert E, Zorlu N, Erol A, Saricicek A, Mete L . Facial emotion recognition deficits in abstinent cannabis dependent patients. Compr Psychiatry. 2015; 58:160-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.008. View

Ahn W, Ramesh D, Moeller F, Vassileva J . Utility of Machine-Learning Approaches to Identify Behavioral Markers for Substance Use Disorders: Impulsivity Dimensions as Predictors of Current Cocaine Dependence. Front Psychiatry. 2016; 7:34. PMC: 4785183. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00034. View

Kalant H . What neurobiology cannot tell us about addiction. Addiction. 2009; 105(5):780-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02739.x. View

Waring J, Greif T, Lenze E . Emotional Response Inhibition Is Greater in Older Than Younger Adults. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:961. PMC: 6504835. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00961. View

Ketcherside A, Jeon-Slaughter H, Baine J, Filbey F . Discriminability of personality profiles in isolated and Co-morbid marijuana and nicotine users. Psychiatry Res. 2016; 238:356-362. PMC: 4834927. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.024. View

Brennan G, Baskin-Sommers A . Cognitive mechanisms influencing facial emotion processing in psychopathy and externalizing. Personal Disord. 2020; 12(6):581-593. DOI: 10.1037/per0000473. View

Agrawal A, Jacobson K, Prescott C, Kendler K . A twin study of personality and illicit drug use and abuse/dependence. Twin Res. 2004; 7(1):72-81. DOI: 10.1375/13690520460741462. View

Ahn W, Vasilev G, Lee S, Busemeyer J, Kruschke J, Bechara A . Decision-making in stimulant and opiate addicts in protracted abstinence: evidence from computational modeling with pure users. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:849. PMC: 4129374. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00849. View

Miyake A, Friedman N . The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012; 21(1):8-14. PMC: 3388901. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411429458. View

10.

Hindocha C, Wollenberg O, Carter Leno V, Alvarez B, Curran H, Freeman T . Emotional processing deficits in chronic cannabis use: a replication and extension. J Psychopharmacol. 2014; 28(5):466-71. DOI: 10.1177/0269881114527359. View

11.

Gandolphe M, Lecluyse B, Triquet C, Brunelle E, Duparcq J, Nandrino J . Mind reading abilities in opiate-dependent patients: An exploratory study. Compr Psychiatry. 2018; 83:46-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.03.001. View

12.

Badiani A, Belin D, Epstein D, Calu D, Shaham Y . Opiate versus psychostimulant addiction: the differences do matter. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 12(11):685-700. PMC: 3721140. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3104. View

13.

Venniro M, Zhang M, Caprioli D, Hoots J, Golden S, Heins C . Volitional social interaction prevents drug addiction in rat models. Nat Neurosci. 2018; 21(11):1520-1529. PMC: 7386559. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0246-6. View

14.

Sheehan D, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan K, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E . The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999; 59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57. View

15.

Veling H, Lawrence N, Chen Z, van Koningsbruggen G, Holland R . What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda. Curr Addict Rep. 2017; 4(1):35-41. PMC: 5350201. DOI: 10.1007/s40429-017-0131-5. View

16.

Loeber S, Grosshans M, Herpertz S, Kiefer F, Herpertz S . Hunger modulates behavioral disinhibition and attention allocation to food-associated cues in normal-weight controls. Appetite. 2013; 71:32-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.07.008. View

17.

Samuelsson H, Jarnvik K, Henningsson H, Andersson J, Carlbring P . The Umeå University Database of Facial Expressions: a validation study. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(5):e136. PMC: 3510711. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2196. View

18.

Degenhardt L, Hall W . Extent of illicit drug use and dependence, and their contribution to the global burden of disease. Lancet. 2012; 379(9810):55-70. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61138-0. View

19.

Hare T, Tottenham N, Davidson M, Glover G, Casey B . Contributions of amygdala and striatal activity in emotion regulation. Biol Psychiatry. 2005; 57(6):624-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.038. View

20.

Kim S, Shin J, Lee Y, Kim H, Jo H, Choi S . Neural evidence for persistent attentional bias to threats in patients with social anxiety disorder. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018; 13(12):1327-1336. PMC: 6277744. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy101. View