Evaluation of the Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index in Infertile Japanese Men by In-house Flow Cytometric Analysis

Overview

Journal Asian J Androl

Specialty Urology

Date 2021 Jun 14

PMID 34121749

Citations 1

Authors

Akiyoshi Osaka

Hiroshi Okada

Sae Onozuka

Takashi Tanaka

Toshiyuki Iwahata

Yukihito Shimomura

Yoshitomo Kobori

Kazutaka Saito

Kouhei Sugimoto

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Semen analysis has long been used to evaluate male fertility. Recently, several sperm function tests have been developed. Of those, the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI), which describes the status of the sperm DNA, is thought to be a suitable parameter for evaluating male fertility. However, there have been no large-scale studies on the sperm DFI of Japanese men. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of using an in-house flow cytometry-based sperm DFI analysis based on the sperm DNA fragmentation test of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) to assess male fertility in Japan. This study enrolled 743 infertile and 20 fertile Japanese men. To evaluate reproducibility, inter- and intraobserver precision was analyzed. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to set a cutoff value for the sperm DFI to identify men who could father children by timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination. The variability of the sperm DFI among fertile volunteers was determined. The relationship between semen parameters and the sperm DFI was assessed by Spearman's rho test. A precision analysis revealed good reproducibility of the sperm DFI. The cutoff value of sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men was 24.0%. Semen volume had no relationship with the sperm DFI. Sperm concentration, sperm motility, total motile sperm count, and percentage of normal-shaped sperm were significantly and negatively correlated with the sperm DFI. The median sperm DFI was smaller in fertile volunteers (7.7%) than that in infertile men (19.4%). Sperm DNA fragmentation analysis can be used to assess sperm functions that cannot be evaluated by ordinary semen analysis.

Citing Articles

Sperm DNA fragmentation index: limited effectiveness on predicting embryo quality in assisted reproduction technology treatments.

Jiang H, Xia X, Luo Y, Pan H, Qu S, Xu J Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):14.

PMID: 39863907 PMC: 11763148. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01345-8.

Impact of antioxidants in improving semen parameters like count, motility and DNA fragmentation in sub-fertile males: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Patki A, Shelatkar R, Singh M, Agarwal S, M V, Umbardand S Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2023; 31(1):28-39.

PMID: 37034126 PMC: 10079508. DOI: 10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e6.

References

Evenson D . Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®). Methods Mol Biol. 2012; 927:147-64. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_14. View

Shi X, Chan C, Waters T, Chi L, Chan D, Li T . Lifestyle and demographic factors associated with human semen quality and sperm function. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018; 64(5):358-367. DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2018.1491074. View

Zhu X, Chen Q, Fan W, Niu Z, Xu B, Zhang A . Sperm DNA fragmentation in Chinese couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Asian J Androl. 2019; 22(3):296-301. PMC: 7275799. DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_60_19. View

Chohan K, Griffin J, Lafromboise M, De Jonge C, Carrell D . Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm. J Androl. 2006; 27(1):53-9. DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.05068. View

Sun T, Zhang Y, Li H, Liu X, Yi D, Tian L . Sperm DNA fragmentation index, as measured by sperm chromatin dispersion, might not predict assisted reproductive outcome. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 57(4):493-498. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.06.003. View

Yanagimachi R, Yanagimachi H, Rogers B . The use of zona-free animal ova as a test-system for the assessment of the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1976; 15(4):471-6. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod15.4.471. View

Evenson D, Djira G, Kasperson K, Christianson J . Relationships between the age of 25,445 men attending infertility clinics and sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®) defined sperm DNA and chromatin integrity. Fertil Steril. 2020; 114(2):311-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.028. View

Mehdi M, Khantouche L, Ajina M, Saad A . Detection of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa: correlation with semen parameters. Andrologia. 2009; 41(6):383-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2009.00953.x. View

Barratt C, Bjorndahl L, De Jonge C, Lamb D, Osorio Martini F, McLachlan R . The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update. 2017; 23(6):660-680. PMC: 5850791. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmx021. View

10.

Vantman D, Bands S, Koukoulis G, Dennison L, Sherins R . Assessment of sperm motion characteristics from fertile and infertile men using a fully automated computer-assisted semen analyzer. Fertil Steril. 1989; 51(1):156-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60446-6. View

11.

Guzick D, Overstreet J, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil C, Nakajima S, Coutifaris C . Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med. 2002; 345(19):1388-93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa003005. View

12.

Rodprasert W, Virtanen H, Sadov S, Perheentupa A, Skakkebaek N, Jorgensen N . An update on semen quality among young Finnish men and comparison with Danish data. Andrology. 2018; 7(1):15-23. PMC: 6519379. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12550. View

13.

Colasante A, Minasi M, Scarselli F, Casciani V, Zazzaro V, Ruberti A . The aging male: Relationship between male age, sperm quality and sperm DNA damage in an unselected population of 3124 men attending the fertility centre for the first time. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019; 90(4):254-259. DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2018.4.254. View

14.

Evenson D, Jost L . Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Methods Cell Sci. 2001; 22(2-3):169-89. DOI: 10.1023/a:1009844109023. View

15.

Kruger T, Acosta A, Simmons K, Swanson R, Matta J, Veeck L . New method of evaluating sperm morphology with predictive value for human in vitro fertilization. Urology. 1987; 30(3):248-51. DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90246-9. View

16.

Benchaib M, Lornage J, Mazoyer C, Lejeune H, Salle B, Guerin J . Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril. 2006; 87(1):93-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.057. View

17.

Menezo Y, Clement P, Amar E . Evaluation of sperm DNA structure, fragmentation and decondensation: an essential tool in the assessment of male infertility. Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6(Suppl 4):S553-S556. PMC: 5643722. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.11. View

18.

Rex A, Aagaard J, Fedder J . DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa: a historical review. Andrology. 2017; 5(4):622-630. PMC: 5601286. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12381. View

19.

Smit M, Romijn J, Wildhagen M, Weber R, Dohle G . Sperm chromatin structure is associated with the quality of spermatogenesis in infertile patients. Fertil Steril. 2009; 94(5):1748-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.030. View

20.

Simon L, Emery B, Carrell D . Sperm DNA Fragmentation: Consequences for Reproduction. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019; 1166:87-105. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21664-1_6. View