» Articles » PMID: 34120268

Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: Reappraisal of Type in Predicting Outcome

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Jun 13
PMID 34120268
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors (GNETs) are typically managed either expectantly or endoscopically. In contrast, locoregional surgery has been recommended for patients with type III GNETs because of the risk of metastasis. This study aimed to identify predictors of outcome independent of type in a contemporary cohort of GNET patients.

Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study of 121 patients with a pathologic diagnosis of primary GNET between January 2009 and June 2019 was performed. GNETs were designated as type 1 (n = 74) if atrophic gastritis was present, or as type III (n = 47) in the absence of atrophic gastritis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathologic factors were examined using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression to assess the impact of various factors on recurrence and overall survival.

Results: Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62.7 months. While there was no difference in OS in patients with different GNET types (p = 0.10), higher tumor grade (p = 0.02) and presence of nodal or distant metastases (p = 0.02) predicted worse survival on multivariable analysis. Among type III GNET patients, those with small (< 0.5 cm), grade 1 lesions ("low-risk") were less likely to develop metastases (0% versus 33%, p < 0.01) and more likely to survive (100% versus 67%, p < 0.01) at 5 years.

Conclusions: Size and tumor grade predict recurrence and survival in patients with GNETs irrespective of type. Small, low-grade type III GNETs are associated with minimal risk of progression and may be managed accordingly.

Citing Articles

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Lamberti G, Panzuto F, Pavel M, OToole D, Ambrosini V, Falconi M Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024; 10(1):25.

PMID: 38605021 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-024-00508-y.


Type 3 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: the rising promise of conservative endoscopic management.

DellUnto E, Esposito G, Rinzivillo M, Marasco M, Annibale B, Panzuto F Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1327864.

PMID: 38357651 PMC: 10864619. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1327864.


ASO Author Reflections: Simplifying the Fundamentals of Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor Management.

Sok C, Shah M Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 31(3):1519-1520.

PMID: 38123732 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14820-6.


Management of Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Review.

Sok C, Ajay P, Tsagkalidis V, Kooby D, Shah M Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 31(3):1509-1518.

PMID: 38062290 PMC: 10922891. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14712-9.


Advances in Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Guo X, Zhao X, Huang G, Yu Y Dig Dis Sci. 2023; 69(1):27-35.

PMID: 37971578 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08180-0.


References
1.
Rindi G, Bordi C, Rappel S, La Rosa S, Stolte M, Solcia E . Gastric carcinoids and neuroendocrine carcinomas: pathogenesis, pathology, and behavior. World J Surg. 1996; 20(2):168-72. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900026. View

2.
Rindi G, Azzoni C, La Rosa S, Klersy C, Paolotti D, Rappel S . ECL cell tumor and poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma of the stomach: prognostic evaluation by pathological analysis. Gastroenterology. 1999; 116(3):532-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70174-5. View

3.
Modlin I, Lye K, Kidd M . A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 2003; 97(4):934-59. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11105. View

4.
Modlin I, Lye K, Kidd M . A 50-year analysis of 562 gastric carcinoids: small tumor or larger problem?. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 99(1):23-32. DOI: 10.1046/j.1572-0241.2003.04027.x. View

5.
Basuroy R, Srirajaskanthan R, Prachalias A, Quaglia A, Ramage J . Review article: the investigation and management of gastric neuroendocrine tumours. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 39(10):1071-84. DOI: 10.1111/apt.12698. View