The Formation of Patient Trust and Its Transference to Online Health Services: the Case of a Dutch Online Patient Portal for Rehabilitation Care

Overview

Journal BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2021 Jun 13

PMID 34118919

Citations 3

Authors

Lex van Velsen

Ina Flierman

Monique Tabak

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Trust is widely recognized as a crucial factor in successful physician-patient communication and patient engagement in treatment. However, with the rise of eHealth technologies, such as online patient portals, the role of trust and the factors that influence it need to be reconsidered. In this study, we aim to identify the factors that contribute to trust in an eHealth service and we aim to identify the consequences of trust in an eHealth service in terms of use.

Methods: The Patient Trust Assessment Tool was provided to new outpatients of a rehabilitation center in the Netherlands, that were expected to use the center's online patient portal. Via this tool, we assessed five trust-related factors. This data was supplemented by questions about demographics (age, gender, rehabilitation treatment) and data about use (number of sessions, total time spent in sessions), derived from data logs. Data was analyzed via Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling.

Results: In total, 93 patients participated in the study. Out of these participants, 61 used the portal at least once. The measurement model was considered good. Trust in the organization was found to affect trust in the care team (β = .63), trust in the care team affected trust in the treatment (β = .60). Both, trust in the care team and trust in the treatment influenced trust in the technology (β = .42 and .30, respectively). Trust in the technology affected the holistic concept trust in the service (β = .78). This holistic trust in the service finally, did not affect use.

Conclusions: This study shows that the formation of this trust is not unidimensional, but consists of different, separate factors (trust in the care organization, trust in the care team and trust in the treatment). Trust transfer does take place from offline to online health services. However, trust in the service does not directly affect the use of the eHealth technology.

Citing Articles

Factors Influencing Telemedicine Adoption Among Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Interview Study.

Schurmann F, Westmattelmann D, Schewe G JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e54777.

PMID: 39869885 PMC: 11811669. DOI: 10.2196/54777.

Assessing Health Disparities in Digital Services and Technologies During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis Using HINTS Data.

Shih H, Min H, Chang J Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025; 19():87-96.

PMID: 39831027 PMC: 11740600. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S495318.

Digital Age Transformation in Patient-Physician Communication: 25-Year Narrative Review (1999-2023).

Song M, Elson J, Bastola D J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e60512.

PMID: 39819592 PMC: 11783030. DOI: 10.2196/60512.

Attitudes, Awareness, and Willingness of Iranians Toward Using Telemedicine in Post-COVID Era: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Gholamzadeh M, Abtahi H, Safdari R, Haghshenas E, Asadi Gharabaghi M, Rahimi B Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(1):e70321.

PMID: 39777285 PMC: 11705432. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70321.

A public value-based model to understand patients' adoption of eHealth: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical application.

Alhur M, Caamano-Alegre J, Reyes-Santias F Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241272567.

PMID: 39360242 PMC: 11445778. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241272567.

References

Hall M, Camacho F, Dugan E, Balkrishnan R . Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues. Health Serv Res. 2002; 37(5):1419-39. PMC: 1464022. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.01070. View

Geissbuhler A . Lessons learned implementing a regional health information exchange in Geneva as a pilot for the Swiss national eHealth strategy. Int J Med Inform. 2013; 82(5):e118-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.11.002. View

Schnall R, Higgins T, Brown W, Carballo-Dieguez A, Bakken S . Trust, Perceived Risk, Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness as Factors Related to mHealth Technology Use. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:467-71. PMC: 5588863. View

Nicholas J, Huckvale K, Larsen M, Basu A, Batterham P, Shaw F . Issues for eHealth in Psychiatry: Results of an Expert Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(2):e55. PMC: 5350456. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6957. View

Platonova E, Kennedy K, Shewchuk R . Understanding patient satisfaction, trust, and loyalty to primary care physicians. Med Care Res Rev. 2008; 65(6):696-712. DOI: 10.1177/1077558708322863. View

Dinc L, Gastmans C . Trust and trustworthiness in nursing: an argument-based literature review. Nurs Inq. 2011; 19(3):223-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00582.x. View

Lyles C, Sarkar U, Ralston J, Adler N, Schillinger D, Moffet H . Patient-provider communication and trust in relation to use of an online patient portal among diabetes patients: The Diabetes and Aging Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20(6):1128-31. PMC: 3822118. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001567. View

van Velsen L, Tabak M, Hermens H . Measuring patient trust in telemedicine services: Development of a survey instrument and its validation for an anticoagulation web-service. Int J Med Inform. 2016; 97:52-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.009. View

Buimer H, Tabak M, van Velsen L, Van der Geest T, Hermens H . Exploring Determinants of Patient Adherence to a Portal-Supported Oncology Rehabilitation Program: Interview and Data Log Analyses. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017; 4(2):e12. PMC: 5746616. DOI: 10.2196/rehab.6294. View

10.

van Velsen L, Wildevuur S, Flierman I, Van Schooten B, Tabak M, Hermens H . Trust in telemedicine portals for rehabilitation care: an exploratory focus group study with patients and healthcare professionals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16:11. PMC: 4728819. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0250-2. View

11.

Ryan B, Brown J, Terry A, Cejic S, Stewart M, Thind A . Implementing and Using a Patient Portal: A qualitative exploration of patient and provider perspectives on engaging patients. J Innov Health Inform. 2016; 23(2):848. DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v23i2.848. View

12.

Graham J, Shahani L, Grimes R, Hartman C, Giordano T . The Influence of Trust in Physicians and Trust in the Healthcare System on Linkage, Retention, and Adherence to HIV Care. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015; 29(12):661-7. PMC: 4684652. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2015.0156. View

13.

Hillen M, de Haes H, Smets E . Cancer patients' trust in their physician-a review. Psychooncology. 2010; 20(3):227-41. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1745. View

14.

Keating N, Gandhi T, Orav E, Bates D, Ayanian J . Patient characteristics and experiences associated with trust in specialist physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164(9):1015-20. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.9.1015. View

15.

Meng F, Guo X, Peng Z, Lai K, Zhao X . Investigating the Adoption of Mobile Health Services by Elderly Users: Trust Transfer Model and Survey Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(1):e12269. PMC: 6329414. DOI: 10.2196/12269. View

16.

Ozawa S, Sripad P . How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 91:10-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.005. View

17.

Lee Y, Lin J . How much does trust really matter? A study of the longitudinal effects of trust and decision-making preferences on diabetic patient outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 85(3):406-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.005. View

18.

Hall M, Dugan E, Zheng B, Mishra A . Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter?. Milbank Q. 2002; 79(4):613-39, v. PMC: 2751209. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00223. View

19.

Hardiker N, Grant M . Factors that influence public engagement with eHealth: A literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2010; 80(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.017. View

20.

LoCurto J, Berg G . Trust in healthcare settings: Scale development, methods, and preliminary determinants. SAGE Open Med. 2016; 4:2050312116664224. PMC: 5011396. DOI: 10.1177/2050312116664224. View