Left Ventricular Paced Activation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block and Relationship to Its Electrical Substrate

Overview

Journal Heart Rhythm O2

Date 2021 Jun 11

PMID 34113862

Citations 8

Authors

Brian J Wisnoskey

Niraj Varma

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) uses left ventricular (LV) pacing to restore rapid synchronized LV activation when it is delayed in patients with myocardial disease.

Objective: Although intrinsic LV activation delays are understood, little is known about reactions to LV stimulation and whether they are affected by QRS duration (QRSd), morphology, LV substrate, or choice of electrode pair. The purpose of this study was to test these interactions.

Methods: In 120 heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRS >120 ms receiving CRT with quadripolar LV leads, device-based measurements of intrinsic activation delay (qLV) and paced inter- (and intra-) LV conduction times were evaluated at the proximal and distal LV bipoles.

Results: During intrinsic conduction, qLV varied little between the proximal and distal pairs in patients with LBBB (n = 120; age 68 ± 11 years; 63% male; ejection fraction 25% ± 7%; 33% ischemic cardiomyopathy; QRSd 162 ± 19 ms). A minority (30%) had conduction barriers (ie, gradients) (ΔqLV 29 ± 8 ms vs 9 ± 5 ms in patients without gradients; <.01), which occurred equally in ischemic and nonischemic patients. A majority were functional (and not scar-mediated), as they resolved with pacing in most patients (75%). Importantly, LV-paced conduction times were unrelated to baseline QRS morphology (LBBB 166 ± 30 ms vs RBBB control 172 ± 30 ms; = NS), longer than intrinsic conduction (166 ± 30 ms vs 129 ± 28 ms; <.01), and varied significantly by electrode pair (ie, small distances) and etiology. Correlation between intrinsic activation delay (qLV) and LV-paced conduction time was poor (R = 0.278; <.05).

Conclusion: LV-paced effect, which is core to CRT, is unpredictable based on conventionally used measures and should be considered during CRT optimization.

Citing Articles

Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing as Alternative Approach in Cases of Biventricular Pacing Failure.

Antoniou C, Chrysohoou C, Manolakou P, Tsiachris D, Kordalis A, Tsioufis K J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004595 PMC: 11856938. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041065.

Multipoint pacing is associated with improved prognosis and cardiac resynchronization therapy response: MORE-CRT MPP randomized study secondary analyses.

Leonardo C, Ermenegildo D, Christof K, Amir J, Pedro M, Pascal D Europace. 2024; 26(11).

PMID: 39365705 PMC: 11572720. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae259.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.

Chung M, Patton K, Lau C, Dal Forno A, Al-Khatib S, Arora V J Arrhythm. 2023; 39(5):681-756.

PMID: 37799799 PMC: 10549836. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12872.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.

Chung M, Patton K, Lau C, Dal Forno A, Al-Khatib S, Arora V Heart Rhythm. 2023; 20(9):e17-e91.

PMID: 37283271 PMC: 11062890. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1538.

Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Ghossein M, van Stipdonk A, Prinzen F, Vernooy K J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022; 19(1):9-20.

PMID: 35233219 PMC: 8832039. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.01.003.

References

Strik M, van Deursen C, van Middendorp L, van Hunnik A, Kuiper M, Auricchio A . Transseptal conduction as an important determinant for cardiac resynchronization therapy, as revealed by extensive electrical mapping in the dyssynchronous canine heart. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6(4):682-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.000028. View

Hsing J, Selzman K, Leclercq C, Pires L, McLaughlin M, McRae S . Paced left ventricular QRS width and ECG parameters predict outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: PROSPECT-ECG substudy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4(6):851-7. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.962605. View

Vernooy K, Verbeek X, Cornelussen R, Dijkman B, Crijns H, Arts T . Calculation of effective VV interval facilitates optimization of AV delay and VV interval in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2007; 4(1):75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.09.007. View

Ginks M, Shetty A, Lambiase P, Duckett S, Bostock J, Peacock J . Benefits of endocardial and multisite pacing are dependent on the type of left ventricular electric activation pattern and presence of ischemic heart disease: insights from electroanatomic mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5(5):889-97. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.967505. View

Feeny A, Rickard J, Patel D, Toro S, Trulock K, Park C . Machine Learning Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Improvement Versus Current Guidelines. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019; 12(7):e007316. PMC: 6588175. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007316. View

Varma N . Multipolar LV leads to optimize CRT-qLV or LV paced effect?. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019; 31(1):238-239. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14306. View

Sassone B, Gabrieli L, Sacca S, Boggian G, Fusco A, Pratola C . Value of right ventricular-left ventricular interlead electrical delay to predict reverse remodelling in cardiac resynchronization therapy: the INTER-V pilot study. Europace. 2009; 12(1):78-83. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup347. View

Trucco E, Tolosana J, Arbelo E, Doltra A, Castel M, Benito E . Improvement of Reverse Remodeling Using Electrocardiogram Fusion-Optimized Intervals in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Randomized Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4(2):181-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.020. View

Varma N . Left ventricular electrical activation during right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with LBBB: visualization by electrocardiographic imaging and implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Electrocardiol. 2014; 48(1):53-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.09.002. View

10.

Pereira H, Jackson T, Sieniewicz B, Gould J, Yao C, Niederer S . Non-invasive electrophysiological assessment of the optimal configuration of quadripolar lead vectors on ventricular activation times. J Electrocardiol. 2018; 51(4):714-719. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.05.006. View

11.

Derval N, Duchateau J, Mahida S, Eschalier R, Sacher F, Lumens J . Distinctive Left Ventricular Activations Associated With ECG Pattern in Heart Failure Patients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017; 10(6). DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005073. View

12.

Coppola G, Ciaramitaro G, Stabile G, DOnofrio A, Palmisano P, Carita P . Magnitude of QRS duration reduction after biventricular pacing identifies responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 221:450-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.203. View

13.

Varma N, Ghanem R, Jia P . Pacing prescription for cardiac resynchronization therapy: When RV stimulation matters. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019; 30(5):769-770. DOI: 10.1111/jce.13850. View

14.

Auricchio A, Fantoni C, Regoli F, Carbucicchio C, Goette A, Geller C . Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block. Circulation. 2004; 109(9):1133-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118502.91105.F6. View

15.

Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal B, Gettes L, Bailey J, Gorgels A . AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53(11):976-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.013. View

16.

Smaill B, Zhao J, Trew M . Three-dimensional impulse propagation in myocardium: arrhythmogenic mechanisms at the tissue level. Circ Res. 2013; 112(5):834-48. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300157. View

17.

Rodriguez L, Timmermans C, Nabar A, Beatty G, Wellens H . Variable patterns of septal activation in patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 14(2):135-41. DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02421.x. View

18.

Ter Horst I, Bogaard M, Tuinenburg A, Mast T, de Boer T, Doevendans P . The concept of triple wavefront fusion during biventricular pacing: Using the EGM to produce the best acute hemodynamic improvement in CRT. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017; 40(7):873-882. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13118. View

19.

Prinzen F, Auricchio A . Is echocardiographic assessment of dyssynchrony useful to select candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy? Echocardiography is not useful before cardiac resynchronization therapy if QRS duration is available. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 1(1):70-7. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.791772. View

20.

Varma N, ODonnell D, Bassiouny M, Ritter P, Pappone C, Mangual J . Programming Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Electrical Synchrony: Reaching Beyond Left Bundle Branch Block and Left Ventricular Activation Delay. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7(3). PMC: 5850248. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007489. View