» Articles » PMID: 34113264

Heart Rate Variability and Clinical Features As Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2021 Jun 11
PMID 34113264
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Single-procedure catheter ablation success rate is as low as 52% in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. This study evaluated the feasibility of using clinical data and heart rate variability (HRV) features extracted from an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) to predict recurrences in patients prior to undergoing catheter ablation for AF. HRV-derived features were extracted from the 500 beats preceding the AF onset and from the first 2 min of the last AF episode recorded by an ICM of 74 patients (67% male; 57 ± 12 years; 26% non-paroxysmal AF; 57% AF recurrence) before undergoing their first AF catheter ablation. Two types of classification algorithm were studied to predict AF recurrence: single classifiers including support vector machines, classification and regression trees, and K-nearest neighbor classifiers as well as ensemble classifiers. The sequential forward floating search algorithm was used to select the optimum feature set for each classification method. The optimum weighted voting method, which used an optimum combination of the single classifiers, was the best overall classifier (accuracy = 0.82, sensitivity = 0.76, and specificity = 0.87). Clinical and HRV features can be used to predict rhythm outcome using an ensemble classifier which would enable a more effective pre-ablation patient triage that could reduce the economic and personal burden of the procedure by increasing the success rate of first catheter ablation.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning in the Management of Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Scoping Review.

Luo A, Chen W, Zhu H, Xie W, Chen X, Liu Z J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e60888.

PMID: 39928932 PMC: 11851043. DOI: 10.2196/60888.


The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Detecting and Predicting Atrial Arrhythmias Post Catheter Ablation.

Lallah P, Laite C, Bangash A, Chooah O, Jiang C Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(8):215.

PMID: 39076714 PMC: 11266764. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2408215.


Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fan X, Li Y, He Q, Wang M, Lan X, Zhang K Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(11):315.

PMID: 39076446 PMC: 11272879. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2411315.


Statistical and Diagnostic Properties of pRRx Parameters in Atrial Fibrillation Detection.

Bus S, Jedrzejewski K, Guzik P J Clin Med. 2022; 11(19).

PMID: 36233572 PMC: 9572524. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195702.


Machine learning techniques for arrhythmic risk stratification: a review of the literature.

Chung C, Bazoukis G, Lee S, Liu Y, Liu T, Letsas K Int J Arrhythmia. 2022; 23.

PMID: 35449883 PMC: 9020640. DOI: 10.1186/s42444-022-00062-2.

References
1.
Ramkumar S, Nerlekar N, DSouza D, Pol D, Kalman J, Marwick T . Atrial fibrillation detection using single lead portable electrocardiographic monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(9):e024178. PMC: 6144487. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024178. View

2.
Delgado-Bonal A, Marshak A . Approximate Entropy and Sample Entropy: A Comprehensive Tutorial. Entropy (Basel). 2020; 21(6). PMC: 7515030. DOI: 10.3390/e21060541. View

3.
Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B . 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(38):2893-2962. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. View

4.
Potpara T, Mujovic N, Sivasambu B, Shantsila A, Marinkovic M, Calkins H . Validation of the MB-LATER score for prediction of late recurrence after catheter-ablation of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 276:130-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.018. View

5.
Mietus J, Peng C, Henry I, Goldsmith R, Goldberger A . The pNNx files: re-examining a widely used heart rate variability measure. Heart. 2002; 88(4):378-80. PMC: 1767394. DOI: 10.1136/heart.88.4.378. View