» Articles » PMID: 34111964

Cumulative Radiation Doses from Recurrent PET-CT Examinations

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2021 Jun 11
PMID 34111964
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET-CT) is an essential imaging modality for the management of various diseases. Increasing numbers of PET-CT examinations are carried out across the world and deliver benefits to patients; however, there are concerns about the cumulative radiation doses from these examinations in patients. Compared to the radiation exposure delivered by CT, there have been few reports on the frequency of patients with a cumulative effective radiation dose of ≥100 mSv from repeated PET-CT examinations. The emerging dose tracking system facilitates surveys on patient cumulative doses by PET-CT because it can easily wrap up exposure doses of PET radiopharmaceuticals and CT. Regardless of the use of a dose tracking system, implementation of justification for PET-CT examinations and utilisation of dose reduction measures are key issues in coping with the cumulative dose in patients. Despite all the advantages of PET/MRI such as eliminating radiation exposure from CT and providing good tissue contrast in MRI, it is expensive and cannot be introduced at every facility; thus, it is still necessary to utilise PET-CT with radiation reduction measures in most clinical situations.

Citing Articles

Radiomics-Based Prediction of Treatment Response to TRuC-T Cell Therapy in Patients with Mesothelioma: A Pilot Study.

Beaumont H, Iannessi A, Thinnes A, Jacques S, Quintas-Cardama A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941830 PMC: 11816047. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030463.


Automated Measurement of Effective Radiation Dose by F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Eom Y, Park Y, Lee S, Lee S, An Y, Park B Tomography. 2024; 10(12):2144-2157.

PMID: 39728913 PMC: 11679132. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10120151.


Iodinated PSMA Ligands as XFI Tracers for Targeted Cell Imaging and Characterization of Nanoparticles.

Kerpa S, Holzapfel M, Staufer T, Kuhrwahl R, Mutas M, Werner S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39595950 PMC: 11594147. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252211880.


The burden of radiation exposure in congenital heart disease: the Italian cohort profile and bioresource collection in HARMONIC project.

Campolo J, Annoni G, Vignati G, Peretti A, Papa M, Colombo P Ital J Pediatr. 2024; 50(1):100.

PMID: 38760836 PMC: 11102118. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-024-01663-4.


Current and Future Use of Long Axial Field-of-View Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scanners in Clinical Oncology.

Roya M, Mostafapour S, Mohr P, Providencia L, Li Z, van Snick J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(21).

PMID: 37958347 PMC: 10648837. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215173.


References
1.
Graham M, Wahl R, Hoffman J, Yap J, Sunderland J, Boellaard R . Summary of the UPICT Protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Clinical Trials. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(6):955-61. PMC: 4587663. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.158402. View

2.
Jadvar H, Colletti P, Delgado-Bolton R, Esposito G, Krause B, Iagaru A . Appropriate Use Criteria for F-FDG PET/CT in Restaging and Treatment Response Assessment of Malignant Disease. J Nucl Med. 2017; 58(12):2026-2037. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.197988. View

3.
Marcus C, Paidpally V, Antoniou A, Zaheer A, Wahl R, Subramaniam R . 18F-FDG PET/CT and lung cancer: value of fourth and subsequent posttherapy follow-up scans for patient management. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(2):204-8. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.147884. View

4.
Kirchner J, Sawicki L, Suntharalingam S, Grueneisen J, Ruhlmann V, Aktas B . Whole-body staging of female patients with recurrent pelvic malignancies: Ultra-fast 18F-FDG PET/MRI compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2):e0172553. PMC: 5321458. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172553. View

5.
Prieto E, Garcia-Velloso M, Rodriguez-Fraile M, Moran V, Garcia-Garcia B, Guillen F . Significant dose reduction is feasible in FDG PET/CT protocols without compromising diagnostic quality. Phys Med. 2018; 46:134-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.021. View