» Articles » PMID: 34110436

Pharmacokinetic Studies of [ Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Detection, Differences in Temporal Distribution and Kinetic Modelling by Tissue Type

Overview
Date 2021 Jun 10
PMID 34110436
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: [ Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is a promising radiopharmaceutical for detecting tumour lesions in prostate cancer, but knowledge of the pharmacokinetics is limited. Dynamic PET-CT was performed to investigate the tumour detection and differences in temporal distribution, as well as in kinetic modelling of [ Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 by tissue type.

Methods: Dynamic PET-CT over the lower abdomen and static whole-body PET-CT 80-90 min p.i. from 142 patients with biochemical recurrence were retrospectively analysed. Detection rates were compared to PSA levels. Average time-activity curves were calculated from tumour lesions and normal tissue. A three-compartment model and non-compartment model were used to calculate tumour kinetics.

Results: Overall detection rate was 70.42%, and in patients with PSA > 0.4 ng/mL 76.67%. All tumour lesions presented the steepest standardised uptake value (SUV) incline in the first 7-8 min before decreasing to different degrees. Normal tissue presented with a low uptake, except for the bladder, which accumulated activity the steepest 15-16 min. p.i.. While all tumour lesions continuously increased, bone metastases showed the steepest decline, resulting in a significantly lower SUV than lymph node metastases (60 and 80-90 min). Transport rate from the blood and tracer binding and internalisation rate were lower in bone metastases. Heterogeneity (fractal dimension) and vascular density were significantly lower in bone metastases.

Conclusion: Even at low PSA between 0.51 and 0.99 ng/mL, detection rate was 57%. Dynamic imaging showed a time window in the first 10 min where tumour uptake is high, but no bladder activity is measured, aiding accuracy in distinction of local recurrence. Kinetic modelling provided additional information for tumour characterisation by tissue type.

Citing Articles

Enhancing the diagnostic capacity of [F]PSMA-1007 PET/MRI in primary prostate cancer staging with artificial intelligence and semi-quantitative DCE: an exploratory study.

Glemser P, Freitag M, Kovacs B, Netzer N, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Haberkorn U EJNMMI Rep. 2024; 8(1):37.

PMID: 39510993 PMC: 11543981. DOI: 10.1186/s41824-024-00225-5.


Impact of different parametric Patlak imaging approaches and comparison with a 2-tissue compartment pharmacokinetic model with a long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT in oncological patients.

Pan L, Sachpekidis C, Hassel J, Christopoulos P, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 52(2):623-637.

PMID: 39256215 PMC: 11732916. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06879-4.


Scalability study on [La]LaCl production with a focus on potential clinical applications.

Bruhlmann S, Walther M, Blei M, Mamat C, Kopka K, Freudenberg R EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2024; 9(1):60.

PMID: 39147960 PMC: 11327230. DOI: 10.1186/s41181-024-00292-w.


Dual-time-point dynamic Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for parametric imaging generation in prostate cancer.

Burasothikul P, Navikhacheevin C, Pasawang P, Sontrapornpol T, Sukprakun C, Khamwan K Ann Nucl Med. 2024; 38(9):700-710.

PMID: 38761312 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01939-z.


Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of Two Novel Ga-Labeled Bispecific PSMA/FAP-Targeted Tracers with 2-Nal-Containing PSMA-Targeted Pharmacophore and Pyridine-Based FAP-Targeted Pharmacophore.

Verena A, Merkens H, Chen C, Chapple D, Wang L, Bendre S Molecules. 2024; 29(4).

PMID: 38398552 PMC: 10892057. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29040800.


References
1.
Afshar-Oromieh A, Babich J, Kratochwil C, Giesel F, Eisenhut M, Kopka K . The Rise of PSMA Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(Suppl 3):79S-89S. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170720. View

2.
Afshar-Oromieh A, Holland-Letz T, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Mier W, Haufe S . Diagnostic performance of Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017; 44(8):1258-1268. PMC: 5486817. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3711-7. View

3.
Hope T, Goodman J, Allen I, Calais J, Fendler W, Carroll P . Metaanalysis of Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Validated by Histopathology. J Nucl Med. 2018; 60(6):786-793. PMC: 6581235. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.219501. View

4.
Fendler W, Calais J, Eiber M, Flavell R, Mishoe A, Feng F . Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019; 5(6):856-863. PMC: 6567829. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0096. View

5.
Eiber M, Fendler W, Rowe S, Calais J, Hofman M, Maurer T . Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligands for Imaging and Therapy. J Nucl Med. 2017; 58(Suppl 2):67S-76S. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186767. View