» Articles » PMID: 34101964

Multicomponent Density Models for Body Composition: Review of the Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Volume Approach

Overview
Journal Obes Rev
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2021 Jun 8
PMID 34101964
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate and precise body composition estimates, notably of total body adiposity, are a vital component of in vivo physiology and metabolic studies. The reference against which other body composition approaches are usually validated or calibrated is the family of methods referred to as multicomponent "body density" models. These models quantify three to six components by combining measurements of body mass, body volume, total body water, and osseous mineral mass. Body mass is measured with calibrated scales, volume with underwater weighing or air-displacement plethysmography, total body water with isotope dilution, and osseous mineral mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Body density is then calculated for use in model as body mass/volume. Studies over the past decade introduced a new approach to quantifying body volume that relies on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements, an advance that simplifies multicomponent density model development by eliminating the need for underwater weighing or air-displacement plethysmography systems when these technologies are unavailable and makes these methods more accessible to research and clinical programs. This review critically examines these new dual-energy X-ray approaches for quantifying body volume and density, explores their shortcomings, suggests alternative derivation approaches, and introduces ideas for potential future research studies.

Citing Articles

Updates on Methods for Body Composition Analysis: Implications for Clinical Practice.

Thomas D, Crofford I, Scudder J, Oletti B, Deb A, Heymsfield S Curr Obes Rep. 2025; 14(1):8.

PMID: 39798028 DOI: 10.1007/s13679-024-00593-w.


Trunk-to-leg volume and appendicular lean mass from a commercial 3-dimensional optical body scanner for disease risk identification.

Bennett J, Wong M, Liu Y, Quon B, Kelly N, Garber A Clin Nutr. 2024; 43(10):2430-2437.

PMID: 39305753 PMC: 11439580. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.09.028.


Comparison of four quick and reliable methods of assessing body fat appropriate for clinical settings among young, middle-age, and older healthy male and female adults.

Escamilla R, Yamashiro K, Asuncion R, MacLean D, Thompson I, McKeough M J Phys Ther Sci. 2024; 36(9):518-525.

PMID: 39239405 PMC: 11374165. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.36.518.


Association between segmental body composition and bone mineral density in US adults: results from the NHANES (2011-2018).

Lin Y, Wang X, Wu R, Zhou J, Feng F BMC Endocr Disord. 2023; 23(1):246.

PMID: 37940909 PMC: 10634103. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-023-01506-z.


Translating digital anthropometry measurements obtained from different 3D body image scanners.

Ashby N, Jake LaPorte G, Richardson D, Scioletti M, Heymsfield S, Shepherd J Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023; 77(9):872-880.

PMID: 37165098 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-023-01289-5.


References
1.
Prior B, Modlesky C, Evans E, Sloniger M, Saunders M, Lewis R . Muscularity and the density of the fat-free mass in athletes. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001; 90(4):1523-31. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.4.1523. View

2.
BEHNKE Jr A, Feen B, WELHAM W . The specific gravity of healthy men. Body weight divided by volume as an index of obesity. 1942. Obes Res. 1995; 3(3):295-300. DOI: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1995.tb00152.x. View

3.
Zibellini J, Seimon R, Lee C, Gibson A, Hsu M, Shapses S . Does Diet-Induced Weight Loss Lead to Bone Loss in Overweight or Obese Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials. J Bone Miner Res. 2015; 30(12):2168-78. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2564. View

4.
Fields D, Gunatilake R, Kalaitzoglou E . Air displacement plethysmography: cradle to grave. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015; 30(2):219-26. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615572443. View

5.
Demura S, Yamaji S, Kobayashi H, Sato S, Nagasawa Y . Validity and reliability of body composition assessed by the sulphur hexafluoride dilution method. J Sports Sci. 2002; 20(9):663-70. DOI: 10.1080/026404102320219365. View